PantryPath Research · WIC Coverage Atlas
WIC in Texas
57.4% coverageTexas's WIC program reaches 57.4% of eligible residents — an estimated 727,000 participants out of 1,267,000 who qualify. That leaves 540,000 pregnant women, infants, and young children eligible but not receiving WIC's food package or nutrition counseling.
1.3M
WIC eligibles
727K
Participants (FY2024 avg)
540K
Unserved eligibles
254
Counties
Texas by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between estimated WIC eligibles, unserved gap, low-income child counts, and child-poverty share. Hover a county for its exact value.
Note: USDA does not publish sub-state WIC participation, so every county in Texas inherits the state's 57.4% coverage rate. County-level eligibles are allocated from state totals in proportion to the county's share of low-income children under 6 (ACS B17024). See methodology.
Loading county map…
Texas at a glance
Coverage rate
57.4%
Participants ÷ eligibles
Participation gap
42.6%
1 − coverage
Eligibles
1.3M
USDA FNS FY2022
Participants
727K
Monthly avg FY2024
Unserved
540K
Eligibles − participants
Kids < 6 low-income
917K
39.9% of universe
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 254 counties in Texas.
Most WIC eligibles
Estimated eligible population
- 1 Harris 236K
- 2 Dallas 134K
- 3 Bexar 93K
- 4 Tarrant 85K
- 5 Hidalgo 72K
Largest unserved gap
Eligibles not receiving WIC
- 1 Harris 101K
- 2 Dallas 57K
- 3 Bexar 40K
- 4 Tarrant 36K
- 5 Hidalgo 31K
Highest child-poverty share
Children < 6 at ≤185% FPL
- 1 Culberson 100.0%
- 2 Dimmit 96.1%
- 3 Jim Hogg 88.9%
- 4 Brooks 82.1%
- 5 Presidio 82.1%
Every county in Texas
All 254 counties with WIC eligibility estimates, unserved gap, and ACS child-poverty context.
| County | Eligibles est. | Participants est. | Unserved est. | Kids < 6 low-income | Poverty share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 2,599 | 1,491 | 1,108 | 1,880 | 51.3% |
| Andrews | 1,038 | 596 | 442 | 751 | 45.9% |
| Angelina | 4,699 | 2,696 | 2,003 | 3,399 | 51.3% |
| Aransas | 701 | 402 | 299 | 507 | 40.8% |
| Archer | 182 | 105 | 77 | 132 | 23.2% |
| Armstrong | 98 | 56 | 42 | 71 | 57.3% |
| Atascosa | 2,222 | 1,275 | 947 | 1,607 | 40.4% |
| Austin | 1,207 | 692 | 515 | 873 | 46.5% |
| Bailey | 380 | 218 | 162 | 275 | 50.9% |
| Bandera | 629 | 361 | 268 | 455 | 48.2% |
| Bastrop | 4,373 | 2,509 | 1,864 | 3,163 | 40.5% |
| Baylor | 148 | 85 | 63 | 107 | 67.3% |
| Bee | 1,720 | 987 | 733 | 1,244 | 64.3% |
| Bell | 22,699 | 13,025 | 9,674 | 16,420 | 47.1% |
| Bexar | 93,465 | 53,630 | 39,835 | 67,611 | 43.0% |
| Blanco | 167 | 96 | 71 | 121 | 21.1% |
| Borden | 68 | 39 | 29 | 49 | 58.3% |
| Bosque | 630 | 362 | 268 | 456 | 39.0% |
| Bowie | 4,425 | 2,539 | 1,886 | 3,201 | 47.7% |
| Brazoria | 8,958 | 5,140 | 3,818 | 6,480 | 22.3% |
| Brazos | 8,872 | 5,091 | 3,781 | 6,418 | 38.7% |
| Brewster | 191 | 109 | 82 | 138 | 25.2% |
| Briscoe | 55 | 32 | 23 | 40 | 48.8% |
| Brooks | 336 | 193 | 143 | 243 | 82.1% |
| Brown | 1,452 | 833 | 619 | 1,050 | 46.7% |
| Burleson | 311 | 178 | 133 | 225 | 17.8% |
| Burnet | 1,505 | 864 | 641 | 1,089 | 38.3% |
| Caldwell | 1,568 | 900 | 668 | 1,134 | 33.4% |
| Calhoun | 831 | 477 | 354 | 601 | 41.6% |
| Callahan | 431 | 247 | 184 | 312 | 32.8% |
| Cameron | 31,134 | 17,865 | 13,269 | 22,522 | 61.4% |
| Camp | 722 | 414 | 308 | 522 | 52.4% |
| Carson | 135 | 78 | 57 | 98 | 31.9% |
| Cass | 1,388 | 796 | 592 | 1,004 | 50.7% |
| Castro | 448 | 257 | 191 | 324 | 43.7% |
| Chambers | 1,764 | 1,012 | 752 | 1,276 | 30.0% |
| Cherokee | 3,155 | 1,810 | 1,345 | 2,282 | 58.1% |
| Childress | 198 | 113 | 85 | 143 | 31.6% |
| Clay | 167 | 96 | 71 | 121 | 23.7% |
| Cochran | 214 | 123 | 91 | 155 | 76.7% |
| Coke | 69 | 40 | 29 | 50 | 31.4% |
| Coleman | 213 | 122 | 91 | 154 | 44.5% |
| Collin | 20,341 | 11,671 | 8,670 | 14,714 | 18.7% |
| Collingsworth | 206 | 118 | 88 | 149 | 74.1% |
| Colorado | 529 | 304 | 225 | 383 | 26.7% |
| Comal | 2,563 | 1,471 | 1,092 | 1,854 | 17.3% |
| Comanche | 547 | 314 | 233 | 396 | 43.0% |
| Concho | 54 | 31 | 23 | 39 | 41.9% |
| Cooke | 2,208 | 1,267 | 941 | 1,597 | 52.8% |
| Coryell | 3,846 | 2,207 | 1,639 | 2,782 | 42.5% |
| Cottle | 68 | 39 | 29 | 49 | 60.5% |
| Crane | 314 | 180 | 134 | 227 | 73.9% |
| Crockett | 66 | 38 | 28 | 48 | 30.8% |
| Crosby | 288 | 165 | 123 | 208 | 55.2% |
| Culberson | 182 | 105 | 77 | 132 | 100.0% |
| Dallam | 492 | 282 | 210 | 356 | 61.0% |
| Dallas | 133,723 | 76,730 | 56,993 | 96,733 | 45.1% |
| Dawson | 802 | 460 | 342 | 580 | 61.1% |
| Deaf Smith | 1,673 | 960 | 713 | 1,210 | 61.2% |
| Delta | 246 | 141 | 105 | 178 | 36.0% |
| Denton | 18,096 | 10,383 | 7,713 | 13,090 | 19.6% |
| DeWitt | 1,369 | 785 | 584 | 990 | 60.2% |
| Dickens | 32 | 18 | 14 | 23 | 21.5% |
| Dimmit | 994 | 570 | 424 | 719 | 96.1% |
| Donley | 26 | 15 | 11 | 19 | 10.9% |
| Duval | 755 | 433 | 322 | 546 | 64.6% |
| Eastland | 668 | 383 | 285 | 483 | 35.1% |
| Ector | 10,383 | 5,958 | 4,425 | 7,511 | 44.0% |
| Edwards | 29 | 17 | 12 | 21 | 43.8% |
| El Paso | 49,611 | 28,467 | 21,144 | 35,888 | 51.5% |
| Ellis | 6,768 | 3,884 | 2,884 | 4,896 | 31.1% |
| Erath | 1,854 | 1,064 | 790 | 1,341 | 45.9% |
| Falls | 658 | 378 | 280 | 476 | 49.0% |
| Fannin | 1,431 | 821 | 610 | 1,035 | 43.6% |
| Fayette | 370 | 213 | 157 | 268 | 17.8% |
| Fisher | 104 | 59 | 45 | 75 | 30.6% |
| Floyd | 369 | 212 | 157 | 267 | 61.8% |
| Foard | 36 | 21 | 15 | 26 | 40.6% |
| Fort Bend | 18,592 | 10,668 | 7,924 | 13,449 | 20.6% |
| Franklin | 299 | 171 | 128 | 216 | 30.0% |
| Freestone | 816 | 468 | 348 | 590 | 47.1% |
| Frio | 982 | 563 | 419 | 710 | 67.0% |
| Gaines | 1,204 | 691 | 513 | 871 | 33.2% |
| Galveston | 10,108 | 5,800 | 4,308 | 7,312 | 29.0% |
| Garza | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.7% |
| Gillespie | 734 | 421 | 313 | 531 | 33.6% |
| Glasscock | 24 | 13 | 11 | 17 | 15.4% |
| Goliad | 317 | 182 | 135 | 229 | 48.0% |
| Gonzales | 1,091 | 626 | 465 | 789 | 49.0% |
| Gray | 1,077 | 618 | 459 | 779 | 50.2% |
| Grayson | 5,314 | 3,049 | 2,265 | 3,844 | 37.3% |
| Gregg | 6,796 | 3,899 | 2,897 | 4,916 | 50.0% |
| Grimes | 861 | 494 | 367 | 623 | 33.7% |
| Guadalupe | 4,356 | 2,499 | 1,857 | 3,151 | 23.9% |
| Hale | 2,416 | 1,387 | 1,029 | 1,748 | 74.1% |
| Hall | 144 | 82 | 62 | 104 | 57.1% |
| Hamilton | 449 | 258 | 191 | 325 | 60.5% |
| Hansford | 241 | 138 | 103 | 174 | 39.7% |
| Hardeman | 119 | 68 | 51 | 86 | 53.4% |
| Hardin | 1,876 | 1,076 | 800 | 1,357 | 32.2% |
| Harris | 236,241 | 135,554 | 100,687 | 170,892 | 43.4% |
| Harrison | 2,909 | 1,669 | 1,240 | 2,104 | 45.3% |
| Hartley | 17 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 3.7% |
| Haskell | 148 | 85 | 63 | 107 | 43.5% |
| Hays | 7,245 | 4,157 | 3,088 | 5,241 | 29.0% |
| Hemphill | 58 | 33 | 25 | 42 | 25.3% |
| Henderson | 3,771 | 2,164 | 1,607 | 2,728 | 49.0% |
| Hidalgo | 71,955 | 41,288 | 30,667 | 52,051 | 62.2% |
| Hill | 1,551 | 890 | 661 | 1,122 | 41.9% |
| Hockley | 1,385 | 795 | 590 | 1,002 | 57.9% |
| Hood | 1,583 | 908 | 675 | 1,145 | 29.3% |
| Hopkins | 1,507 | 865 | 642 | 1,090 | 39.9% |
| Houston | 864 | 496 | 368 | 625 | 47.0% |
| Howard | 800 | 459 | 341 | 579 | 25.8% |
| Hudspeth | 21 | 12 | 9 | 15 | 12.3% |
| Hunt | 5,383 | 3,089 | 2,294 | 3,894 | 48.5% |
| Hutchinson | 860 | 493 | 367 | 622 | 46.7% |
| Irion | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7.1% |
| Jack | 274 | 157 | 117 | 198 | 40.9% |
| Jackson | 777 | 446 | 331 | 562 | 47.9% |
| Jasper | 1,315 | 754 | 561 | 951 | 43.4% |
| Jeff Davis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Jefferson | 13,955 | 8,007 | 5,948 | 10,095 | 51.1% |
| Jim Hogg | 1,026 | 589 | 437 | 742 | 88.9% |
| Jim Wells | 2,202 | 1,264 | 938 | 1,593 | 52.1% |
| Johnson | 6,427 | 3,688 | 2,739 | 4,649 | 33.4% |
| Jones | 601 | 345 | 256 | 435 | 48.1% |
| Karnes | 823 | 472 | 351 | 595 | 70.4% |
| Kaufman | 6,453 | 3,703 | 2,750 | 4,668 | 33.6% |
| Kendall | 805 | 462 | 343 | 582 | 23.2% |
| Kenedy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Kent | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 29.4% |
| Kerr | 2,394 | 1,374 | 1,020 | 1,732 | 55.9% |
| Kimble | 155 | 89 | 66 | 112 | 61.9% |
| King | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Kinney | 141 | 81 | 60 | 102 | 63.7% |
| Kleberg | 2,333 | 1,339 | 994 | 1,688 | 66.1% |
| Knox | 227 | 130 | 97 | 164 | 66.9% |
| La Salle | 129 | 74 | 55 | 93 | 57.4% |
| Lamar | 2,927 | 1,679 | 1,248 | 2,117 | 49.3% |
| Lamb | 575 | 330 | 245 | 416 | 42.1% |
| Lampasas | 769 | 441 | 328 | 556 | 39.5% |
| Lavaca | 1,020 | 585 | 435 | 738 | 50.2% |
| Lee | 858 | 493 | 365 | 621 | 47.0% |
| Leon | 643 | 369 | 274 | 465 | 49.6% |
| Liberty | 6,059 | 3,477 | 2,582 | 4,383 | 49.7% |
| Limestone | 1,081 | 620 | 461 | 782 | 48.4% |
| Lipscomb | 113 | 65 | 48 | 82 | 32.4% |
| Live Oak | 480 | 275 | 205 | 347 | 47.7% |
| Llano | 451 | 259 | 192 | 326 | 40.2% |
| Loving | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Lubbock | 13,283 | 7,622 | 5,661 | 9,609 | 40.4% |
| Lynn | 250 | 144 | 106 | 181 | 40.8% |
| Madison | 759 | 435 | 324 | 549 | 62.8% |
| Marion | 510 | 293 | 217 | 369 | 67.2% |
| Martin | 163 | 94 | 69 | 118 | 32.5% |
| Mason | 166 | 95 | 71 | 120 | 35.5% |
| Matagorda | 1,830 | 1,050 | 780 | 1,324 | 42.3% |
| Maverick | 4,755 | 2,729 | 2,026 | 3,440 | 59.1% |
| McCulloch | 341 | 196 | 145 | 247 | 53.6% |
| McLennan | 12,126 | 6,958 | 5,168 | 8,772 | 44.4% |
| McMullen | 97 | 56 | 41 | 70 | 76.1% |
| Medina | 1,562 | 896 | 666 | 1,130 | 33.1% |
| Menard | 30 | 17 | 13 | 22 | 16.7% |
| Midland | 6,253 | 3,588 | 2,665 | 4,523 | 26.5% |
| Milam | 957 | 549 | 408 | 692 | 39.8% |
| Mills | 37 | 21 | 16 | 27 | 20.9% |
| Mitchell | 379 | 217 | 162 | 274 | 52.7% |
| Montague | 673 | 386 | 287 | 487 | 40.5% |
| Montgomery | 19,565 | 11,226 | 8,339 | 14,153 | 27.7% |
| Moore | 1,789 | 1,026 | 763 | 1,294 | 64.8% |
| Morris | 535 | 307 | 228 | 387 | 51.5% |
| Motley | 11 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8.7% |
| Nacogdoches | 3,039 | 1,743 | 1,296 | 2,198 | 50.1% |
| Navarro | 3,023 | 1,735 | 1,288 | 2,187 | 50.5% |
| Newton | 383 | 220 | 163 | 277 | 45.7% |
| Nolan | 803 | 461 | 342 | 581 | 54.8% |
| Nueces | 17,544 | 10,067 | 7,477 | 12,691 | 47.4% |
| Ochiltree | 704 | 404 | 300 | 509 | 53.8% |
| Oldham | 100 | 57 | 43 | 72 | 55.8% |
| Orange | 3,991 | 2,290 | 1,701 | 2,887 | 43.1% |
| Palo Pinto | 1,605 | 921 | 684 | 1,161 | 56.0% |
| Panola | 806 | 462 | 344 | 583 | 35.9% |
| Parker | 2,581 | 1,481 | 1,100 | 1,867 | 16.1% |
| Parmer | 487 | 279 | 208 | 352 | 39.1% |
| Pecos | 778 | 447 | 331 | 563 | 54.3% |
| Polk | 2,188 | 1,256 | 932 | 1,583 | 50.0% |
| Potter | 7,722 | 4,431 | 3,291 | 5,586 | 58.3% |
| Presidio | 670 | 385 | 285 | 485 | 82.1% |
| Rains | 395 | 227 | 168 | 286 | 43.1% |
| Randall | 4,223 | 2,423 | 1,800 | 3,055 | 30.9% |
| Reagan | 194 | 111 | 83 | 140 | 37.9% |
| Real | 55 | 32 | 23 | 40 | 34.8% |
| Red River | 722 | 414 | 308 | 522 | 63.0% |
| Reeves | 1,066 | 612 | 454 | 771 | 79.2% |
| Refugio | 268 | 154 | 114 | 194 | 44.8% |
| Roberts | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 10.8% |
| Robertson | 806 | 462 | 344 | 583 | 48.6% |
| Rockwall | 965 | 554 | 411 | 698 | 8.2% |
| Runnels | 380 | 218 | 162 | 275 | 39.2% |
| Rusk | 2,252 | 1,292 | 960 | 1,629 | 48.7% |
| Sabine | 516 | 296 | 220 | 373 | 56.9% |
| San Augustine | 361 | 207 | 154 | 261 | 71.1% |
| San Jacinto | 943 | 541 | 402 | 682 | 39.7% |
| San Patricio | 3,732 | 2,142 | 1,590 | 2,700 | 50.9% |
| San Saba | 210 | 121 | 89 | 152 | 43.2% |
| Schleicher | 33 | 19 | 14 | 24 | 10.7% |
| Scurry | 550 | 316 | 234 | 398 | 35.0% |
| Shackelford | 84 | 48 | 36 | 61 | 27.0% |
| Shelby | 1,742 | 999 | 743 | 1,260 | 62.7% |
| Sherman | 144 | 82 | 62 | 104 | 68.4% |
| Smith | 9,608 | 5,513 | 4,095 | 6,950 | 39.7% |
| Somervell | 108 | 62 | 46 | 78 | 15.4% |
| Starr | 7,730 | 4,436 | 3,294 | 5,592 | 74.0% |
| Stephens | 250 | 144 | 106 | 181 | 26.7% |
| Sterling | 108 | 62 | 46 | 78 | 43.3% |
| Stonewall | 69 | 40 | 29 | 50 | 47.6% |
| Sutton | 163 | 94 | 69 | 118 | 38.8% |
| Swisher | 406 | 233 | 173 | 294 | 61.1% |
| Tarrant | 84,630 | 48,561 | 36,069 | 61,220 | 37.3% |
| Taylor | 6,438 | 3,694 | 2,744 | 4,657 | 39.9% |
| Terrell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Terry | 1,147 | 658 | 489 | 830 | 73.1% |
| Throckmorton | 84 | 48 | 36 | 61 | 43.3% |
| Titus | 1,769 | 1,015 | 754 | 1,280 | 50.3% |
| Tom Green | 5,018 | 2,879 | 2,139 | 3,630 | 40.4% |
| Travis | 32,641 | 18,729 | 13,912 | 23,612 | 27.3% |
| Trinity | 630 | 362 | 268 | 456 | 58.9% |
| Tyler | 523 | 300 | 223 | 378 | 40.5% |
| Upshur | 1,464 | 840 | 624 | 1,059 | 37.6% |
| Upton | 58 | 33 | 25 | 42 | 48.8% |
| Uvalde | 1,420 | 815 | 605 | 1,027 | 49.4% |
| Val Verde | 3,265 | 1,874 | 1,391 | 2,362 | 50.3% |
| Van Zandt | 2,394 | 1,374 | 1,020 | 1,732 | 39.4% |
| Victoria | 3,764 | 2,160 | 1,604 | 2,723 | 39.7% |
| Walker | 2,441 | 1,401 | 1,040 | 1,766 | 50.2% |
| Waller | 2,296 | 1,318 | 978 | 1,661 | 42.2% |
| Ward | 571 | 328 | 243 | 413 | 45.0% |
| Washington | 807 | 463 | 344 | 584 | 24.4% |
| Webb | 19,027 | 10,918 | 8,109 | 13,764 | 52.7% |
| Wharton | 1,554 | 892 | 662 | 1,124 | 35.2% |
| Wheeler | 278 | 159 | 119 | 201 | 67.7% |
| Wichita | 6,112 | 3,507 | 2,605 | 4,421 | 46.9% |
| Wilbarger | 972 | 558 | 414 | 703 | 66.1% |
| Willacy | 1,259 | 723 | 536 | 911 | 66.6% |
| Williamson | 10,472 | 6,009 | 4,463 | 7,575 | 16.4% |
| Wilson | 918 | 527 | 391 | 664 | 19.7% |
| Winkler | 301 | 173 | 128 | 218 | 29.3% |
| Wise | 2,741 | 1,573 | 1,168 | 1,983 | 38.8% |
| Wood | 1,710 | 981 | 729 | 1,237 | 47.3% |
| Yoakum | 406 | 233 | 173 | 294 | 37.4% |
| Young | 767 | 440 | 327 | 555 | 50.0% |
| Zapata | 1,315 | 754 | 561 | 951 | 71.9% |
| Zavala | 813 | 466 | 347 | 588 | 74.2% |
Apply for WIC in Texas
Income limits, food-package rules, clinic locator, and application instructions specific to Texas's WIC agency.
Texas WIC guideFamilies with children
Our population-specific guide: WIC, SNAP, school meals, Summer EBT, and pantry programs for families with kids in Texas.
Families guideTexas SNAP
SNAP recipients are automatically income-eligible for WIC through adjunctive eligibility — often the fastest path to enrollment.
Texas SNAP guideFind a food pantry
Search Texas's verified pantries — many partner with WIC clinics and distribute infant formula, baby food, and diapers.
Texas food pantriesWIC methodology
How we estimated county-level eligibles, why state coverage rates can't be disaggregated, and which data sources we used.
Full methodology