PantryPath Research · WIC Coverage Atlas
WIC in New Mexico
58.1% coverageNew Mexico's WIC program reaches 58.1% of eligible residents — an estimated 43,000 participants out of 74,000 who qualify. That leaves 31,000 pregnant women, infants, and young children eligible but not receiving WIC's food package or nutrition counseling.
74K
WIC eligibles
43K
Participants (FY2024 avg)
31K
Unserved eligibles
33
Counties
New Mexico by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between estimated WIC eligibles, unserved gap, low-income child counts, and child-poverty share. Hover a county for its exact value.
Note: USDA does not publish sub-state WIC participation, so every county in New Mexico inherits the state's 58.1% coverage rate. County-level eligibles are allocated from state totals in proportion to the county's share of low-income children under 6 (ACS B17024). See methodology.
Loading county map…
New Mexico at a glance
Coverage rate
58.1%
Participants ÷ eligibles
Participation gap
41.9%
1 − coverage
Eligibles
74K
USDA FNS FY2022
Participants
43K
Monthly avg FY2024
Unserved
31K
Eligibles − participants
Kids < 6 low-income
68K
50.3% of universe
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 33 counties in New Mexico.
Most WIC eligibles
Estimated eligible population
- 1 Bernalillo 19K
- 2 Doña Ana 10K
- 3 San Juan 6K
- 4 McKinley 4K
- 5 Otero 3K
Largest unserved gap
Eligibles not receiving WIC
- 1 Bernalillo 8K
- 2 Doña Ana 4K
- 3 San Juan 2K
- 4 McKinley 2K
- 5 Otero 1K
Highest child-poverty share
Children < 6 at ≤185% FPL
- 1 Quay 90.3%
- 2 McKinley 73.2%
- 3 Roosevelt 72.3%
- 4 Luna 67.2%
- 5 Grant 67.2%
Every county in New Mexico
All 33 counties with WIC eligibility estimates, unserved gap, and ACS child-poverty context.
| County | Eligibles est. | Participants est. | Unserved est. | Kids < 6 low-income | Poverty share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernalillo | 18,990 | 11,035 | 7,955 | 17,458 | 43.5% |
| Catron | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 47.8% |
| Chaves | 3,043 | 1,769 | 1,274 | 2,798 | 60.6% |
| Cibola | 1,250 | 726 | 524 | 1,149 | 64.7% |
| Colfax | 425 | 247 | 178 | 391 | 62.0% |
| Curry | 2,294 | 1,333 | 961 | 2,109 | 46.9% |
| De Baca | 50 | 29 | 21 | 46 | 28.4% |
| Doña Ana | 9,871 | 5,736 | 4,135 | 9,075 | 60.0% |
| Eddy | 1,726 | 1,003 | 723 | 1,587 | 31.4% |
| Grant | 1,092 | 635 | 457 | 1,004 | 67.2% |
| Guadalupe | 147 | 85 | 62 | 135 | 52.1% |
| Harding | 15 | 9 | 6 | 14 | 58.3% |
| Hidalgo | 137 | 80 | 57 | 126 | 44.2% |
| Lea | 3,213 | 1,867 | 1,346 | 2,954 | 43.3% |
| Lincoln | 699 | 406 | 293 | 643 | 65.5% |
| Los Alamos | 133 | 77 | 56 | 122 | 11.7% |
| Luna | 1,567 | 911 | 656 | 1,441 | 67.2% |
| McKinley | 4,267 | 2,480 | 1,787 | 3,923 | 73.2% |
| Mora | 82 | 47 | 35 | 75 | 66.4% |
| Otero | 3,356 | 1,950 | 1,406 | 3,085 | 59.7% |
| Quay | 273 | 159 | 114 | 251 | 90.3% |
| Rio Arriba | 1,583 | 920 | 663 | 1,455 | 62.3% |
| Roosevelt | 1,098 | 638 | 460 | 1,009 | 72.3% |
| San Juan | 5,772 | 3,354 | 2,418 | 5,306 | 63.5% |
| San Miguel | 755 | 439 | 316 | 694 | 50.2% |
| Sandoval | 3,269 | 1,899 | 1,370 | 3,005 | 33.8% |
| Santa Fe | 3,289 | 1,911 | 1,378 | 3,024 | 42.5% |
| Sierra | 377 | 219 | 158 | 347 | 66.3% |
| Socorro | 782 | 454 | 328 | 719 | 61.5% |
| Taos | 648 | 377 | 271 | 596 | 45.3% |
| Torrance | 544 | 316 | 228 | 500 | 58.4% |
| Union | 231 | 134 | 97 | 212 | 53.3% |
| Valencia | 3,010 | 1,749 | 1,261 | 2,767 | 50.4% |
Apply for WIC in New Mexico
Income limits, food-package rules, clinic locator, and application instructions specific to New Mexico's WIC agency.
New Mexico WIC guideFamilies with children
Our population-specific guide: WIC, SNAP, school meals, Summer EBT, and pantry programs for families with kids in New Mexico.
Families guideNew Mexico SNAP
SNAP recipients are automatically income-eligible for WIC through adjunctive eligibility — often the fastest path to enrollment.
New Mexico SNAP guideFind a food pantry
Search New Mexico's verified pantries — many partner with WIC clinics and distribute infant formula, baby food, and diapers.
New Mexico food pantriesWIC methodology
How we estimated county-level eligibles, why state coverage rates can't be disaggregated, and which data sources we used.
Full methodology