PantryPath Research · WIC Coverage Atlas
WIC in Colorado
52.7% coverageColorado's WIC program reaches 52.7% of eligible residents — an estimated 77,000 participants out of 146,000 who qualify. That leaves 69,000 pregnant women, infants, and young children eligible but not receiving WIC's food package or nutrition counseling.
146K
WIC eligibles
77K
Participants (FY2024 avg)
69K
Unserved eligibles
64
Counties
Colorado by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between estimated WIC eligibles, unserved gap, low-income child counts, and child-poverty share. Hover a county for its exact value.
Note: USDA does not publish sub-state WIC participation, so every county in Colorado inherits the state's 52.7% coverage rate. County-level eligibles are allocated from state totals in proportion to the county's share of low-income children under 6 (ACS B17024). See methodology.
Loading county map…
Colorado at a glance
Coverage rate
52.7%
Participants ÷ eligibles
Participation gap
47.3%
1 − coverage
Eligibles
146K
USDA FNS FY2022
Participants
77K
Monthly avg FY2024
Unserved
69K
Eligibles − participants
Kids < 6 low-income
98K
26.1% of universe
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 64 counties in Colorado.
Most WIC eligibles
Estimated eligible population
- 1 El Paso 23K
- 2 Denver 19K
- 3 Adams 19K
- 4 Arapahoe 18K
- 5 Weld 10K
Largest unserved gap
Eligibles not receiving WIC
- 1 El Paso 11K
- 2 Denver 9K
- 3 Adams 9K
- 4 Arapahoe 9K
- 5 Weld 5K
Highest child-poverty share
Children < 6 at ≤185% FPL
- 1 Bent 80.3%
- 2 Conejos 67.9%
- 3 Alamosa 66.0%
- 4 Dolores 64.8%
- 5 Costilla 64.5%
Every county in Colorado
All 64 counties with WIC eligibility estimates, unserved gap, and ACS child-poverty context.
| County | Eligibles est. | Participants est. | Unserved est. | Kids < 6 low-income | Poverty share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams | 18,550 | 9,783 | 8,767 | 12,499 | 31.1% |
| Alamosa | 1,095 | 578 | 517 | 738 | 66.0% |
| Arapahoe | 18,190 | 9,594 | 8,596 | 12,257 | 27.0% |
| Archuleta | 276 | 146 | 130 | 186 | 27.2% |
| Baca | 200 | 106 | 94 | 135 | 61.6% |
| Bent | 297 | 157 | 140 | 200 | 80.3% |
| Boulder | 4,532 | 2,390 | 2,142 | 3,054 | 19.0% |
| Broomfield | 761 | 402 | 359 | 513 | 11.8% |
| Chaffee | 258 | 136 | 122 | 174 | 19.0% |
| Cheyenne | 43 | 23 | 20 | 29 | 27.6% |
| Clear Creek | 128 | 67 | 61 | 86 | 28.2% |
| Conejos | 554 | 292 | 262 | 373 | 67.9% |
| Costilla | 178 | 94 | 84 | 120 | 64.5% |
| Crowley | 104 | 55 | 49 | 70 | 40.9% |
| Custer | 46 | 24 | 22 | 31 | 33.3% |
| Delta | 907 | 478 | 429 | 611 | 37.5% |
| Denver | 18,686 | 9,855 | 8,831 | 12,591 | 27.4% |
| Dolores | 120 | 63 | 57 | 81 | 64.8% |
| Douglas | 2,033 | 1,072 | 961 | 1,370 | 5.7% |
| Eagle | 1,699 | 896 | 803 | 1,145 | 36.6% |
| El Paso | 23,251 | 12,263 | 10,988 | 15,667 | 29.1% |
| Elbert | 300 | 158 | 142 | 202 | 13.3% |
| Fremont | 1,631 | 860 | 771 | 1,099 | 49.7% |
| Garfield | 2,268 | 1,196 | 1,072 | 1,528 | 31.0% |
| Gilpin | 119 | 63 | 56 | 80 | 28.7% |
| Grand | 141 | 74 | 67 | 95 | 13.4% |
| Gunnison | 110 | 58 | 52 | 74 | 12.8% |
| Hinsdale | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Huerfano | 151 | 80 | 71 | 102 | 27.5% |
| Jackson | 24 | 13 | 11 | 16 | 34.0% |
| Jefferson | 7,475 | 3,942 | 3,533 | 5,037 | 14.9% |
| Kiowa | 36 | 19 | 17 | 24 | 34.3% |
| Kit Carson | 260 | 137 | 123 | 175 | 32.6% |
| La Plata | 1,420 | 749 | 671 | 957 | 30.2% |
| Lake | 24 | 13 | 11 | 16 | 4.0% |
| Larimer | 6,500 | 3,428 | 3,072 | 4,380 | 22.0% |
| Las Animas | 579 | 305 | 274 | 390 | 52.7% |
| Lincoln | 221 | 117 | 104 | 149 | 54.2% |
| Logan | 818 | 431 | 387 | 551 | 42.0% |
| Mesa | 5,028 | 2,652 | 2,376 | 3,388 | 35.8% |
| Mineral | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 21.9% |
| Moffat | 714 | 376 | 338 | 481 | 48.9% |
| Montezuma | 1,196 | 631 | 565 | 806 | 50.8% |
| Montrose | 1,492 | 787 | 705 | 1,005 | 40.5% |
| Morgan | 1,195 | 630 | 565 | 805 | 34.7% |
| Otero | 1,134 | 598 | 536 | 764 | 58.3% |
| Ouray | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5.5% |
| Park | 154 | 81 | 73 | 104 | 18.3% |
| Phillips | 270 | 142 | 128 | 182 | 42.2% |
| Pitkin | 16 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 1.6% |
| Prowers | 812 | 428 | 384 | 547 | 52.2% |
| Pueblo | 7,186 | 3,790 | 3,396 | 4,842 | 43.5% |
| Rio Blanco | 252 | 133 | 119 | 170 | 32.1% |
| Rio Grande | 239 | 126 | 113 | 161 | 25.2% |
| Routt | 249 | 131 | 118 | 168 | 13.5% |
| Saguache | 386 | 204 | 182 | 260 | 59.2% |
| San Juan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% |
| San Miguel | 171 | 90 | 81 | 115 | 29.2% |
| Sedgwick | 85 | 45 | 40 | 57 | 27.3% |
| Summit | 444 | 234 | 210 | 299 | 20.2% |
| Teller | 267 | 141 | 126 | 180 | 16.8% |
| Washington | 128 | 67 | 61 | 86 | 29.9% |
| Weld | 10,154 | 5,355 | 4,799 | 6,842 | 25.3% |
| Yuma | 423 | 223 | 200 | 285 | 36.4% |
Apply for WIC in Colorado
Income limits, food-package rules, clinic locator, and application instructions specific to Colorado's WIC agency.
Colorado WIC guideFamilies with children
Our population-specific guide: WIC, SNAP, school meals, Summer EBT, and pantry programs for families with kids in Colorado.
Families guideColorado SNAP
SNAP recipients are automatically income-eligible for WIC through adjunctive eligibility — often the fastest path to enrollment.
Colorado SNAP guideFind a food pantry
Search Colorado's verified pantries — many partner with WIC clinics and distribute infant formula, baby food, and diapers.
Colorado food pantriesWIC methodology
How we estimated county-level eligibles, why state coverage rates can't be disaggregated, and which data sources we used.
Full methodology