PantryPath Research · WIC Coverage Atlas
WIC in Alaska
72.7% coverageAlaska's WIC program reaches 72.7% of eligible residents — an estimated 16,000 participants out of 22,000 who qualify. That leaves 6,000 pregnant women, infants, and young children eligible but not receiving WIC's food package or nutrition counseling.
22K
WIC eligibles
16K
Participants (FY2024 avg)
6K
Unserved eligibles
30
Counties
Alaska by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between estimated WIC eligibles, unserved gap, low-income child counts, and child-poverty share. Hover a county for its exact value.
Note: USDA does not publish sub-state WIC participation, so every county in Alaska inherits the state's 72.7% coverage rate. County-level eligibles are allocated from state totals in proportion to the county's share of low-income children under 6 (ACS B17024). See methodology.
Loading county map…
Alaska at a glance
Coverage rate
72.7%
Participants ÷ eligibles
Participation gap
27.3%
1 − coverage
Eligibles
22K
USDA FNS FY2022
Participants
16K
Monthly avg FY2024
Unserved
6K
Eligibles − participants
Kids < 6 low-income
18K
32.4% of universe
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 30 counties in Alaska.
Most WIC eligibles
Estimated eligible population
- 1 Anchorage 8K
- 2 Matanuska-Susitna 3K
- 3 Fairbanks North Star 2K
- 4 Bethel 2K
- 5 Kenai Peninsula 1K
Largest unserved gap
Eligibles not receiving WIC
- 1 Anchorage 2K
- 2 Matanuska-Susitna 841
- 3 Fairbanks North Star 598
- 4 Bethel 441
- 5 Kenai Peninsula 349
Highest child-poverty share
Children < 6 at ≤185% FPL
- 1 Kusilvak 66.6%
- 2 Lake and Peninsula 64.3%
- 3 Yukon-Koyukuk 63.5%
- 4 Bethel 57.1%
- 5 Copper River 56.6%
Every county in Alaska
All 30 counties with WIC eligibility estimates, unserved gap, and ACS child-poverty context.
| County | Eligibles est. | Participants est. | Unserved est. | Kids < 6 low-income | Poverty share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleutians East | 66 | 48 | 18 | 55 | 43.3% |
| Aleutians West | 37 | 27 | 10 | 31 | 22.5% |
| Anchorage | 8,254 | 6,003 | 2,251 | 6,918 | 30.3% |
| Bethel | 1,617 | 1,176 | 441 | 1,355 | 57.1% |
| Bristol Bay | 14 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 16.9% |
| Chugach | 253 | 184 | 69 | 212 | 38.2% |
| Copper River | 137 | 100 | 37 | 115 | 56.6% |
| Denali | 31 | 23 | 8 | 26 | 27.7% |
| Dillingham | 272 | 198 | 74 | 228 | 49.1% |
| Fairbanks North Star | 2,191 | 1,593 | 598 | 1,836 | 23.0% |
| Haines | 10 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 8.2% |
| Hoonah-Angoon | 55 | 40 | 15 | 46 | 46.5% |
| Juneau City and | 469 | 341 | 128 | 393 | 21.2% |
| Kenai Peninsula | 1,280 | 931 | 349 | 1,073 | 26.6% |
| Ketchikan Gateway | 196 | 142 | 54 | 164 | 20.1% |
| Kodiak Island | 389 | 283 | 106 | 326 | 36.2% |
| Kusilvak | 960 | 699 | 261 | 805 | 66.6% |
| Lake and Peninsula | 64 | 47 | 17 | 54 | 64.3% |
| Matanuska-Susitna | 3,082 | 2,241 | 841 | 2,583 | 31.8% |
| Nome | 605 | 440 | 165 | 507 | 54.6% |
| North Slope | 264 | 192 | 72 | 221 | 30.6% |
| Northwest Arctic | 588 | 428 | 160 | 493 | 53.9% |
| Petersburg | 57 | 42 | 15 | 48 | 26.4% |
| Prince of Wales-Hyder | 236 | 172 | 64 | 198 | 50.8% |
| Sitka City and | 177 | 128 | 49 | 148 | 34.7% |
| Skagway | 32 | 23 | 9 | 27 | 37.0% |
| Southeast Fairbanks | 246 | 179 | 67 | 206 | 34.4% |
| Wrangell City and | 81 | 59 | 22 | 68 | 45.6% |
| Yakutat City and | 14 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 38.7% |
| Yukon-Koyukuk | 323 | 235 | 88 | 271 | 63.5% |
Apply for WIC in Alaska
Income limits, food-package rules, clinic locator, and application instructions specific to Alaska's WIC agency.
Alaska WIC guideFamilies with children
Our population-specific guide: WIC, SNAP, school meals, Summer EBT, and pantry programs for families with kids in Alaska.
Families guideAlaska SNAP
SNAP recipients are automatically income-eligible for WIC through adjunctive eligibility — often the fastest path to enrollment.
Alaska SNAP guideFind a food pantry
Search Alaska's verified pantries — many partner with WIC clinics and distribute infant formula, baby food, and diapers.
Alaska food pantriesWIC methodology
How we estimated county-level eligibles, why state coverage rates can't be disaggregated, and which data sources we used.
Full methodology