PantryPath Research · SNAP Benefits Report
SNAP Benefits in
Oklahoma
Oklahoma had an overall SNAP participation rate of 13.6% across 77 counties, with a coverage gap of 51.3% of below-poverty households. Use the interactive map below to compare coverage across counties.
13.6%
SNAP participation
51.3%
Poverty coverage gap
210K
SNAP households
$63,603
Median income
Oklahoma by county
← Back to national overviewToggle between six SNAP metrics to see how coverage varies within Oklahoma. Hover a county for its exact rate.
Loading county map…
Oklahoma at a glance
SNAP households
210K
Est. from ACS receipt rate
Participation rate
13.6%
All households
Poverty coverage
48.7%
Below-poverty HH on SNAP
Senior SNAP use
30.8%
HH with a 60+ member
Disability SNAP use
51.1%
HH with a disability
Working-poor share
51.3%
SNAP HH above poverty
County-level hotspots
Five-county rankings across 77 counties in Oklahoma.
Widest coverage gap
% of poor HH not enrolled
- 1 Texas 84.0%
- 2 Harper 80.7%
- 3 Payne 79.4%
- 4 Dewey 75.6%
- 5 Beaver 74.2%
Strongest coverage
% of poor HH enrolled
- 1 Tillman 60.5%
- 2 Choctaw 59.5%
- 3 Jefferson 57.5%
- 4 Johnston 57.3%
- 5 Nowata 55.6%
Highest SNAP use
% of all HH on SNAP
- 1 Adair 24.2%
- 2 Jefferson 23.9%
- 3 Choctaw 23.4%
- 4 Kiowa 22.2%
- 5 Greer 22.1%
Every county in Oklahoma
All 77 counties across the six SNAP metrics plus median income.
| County | SNAP rate | Coverage | Gap | Senior | Disability | Working-poor | Median income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adair | 24.2% | 48.7% | 51.3% | 33.6% | 58.1% | 52.9% | $48,028 |
| Alfalfa | 9.5% | 35.5% | 64.5% | 27.8% | 55.6% | 51.1% | $67,870 |
| Atoka | 14.9% | 44.1% | 55.9% | 31.0% | 65.3% | 43.8% | $52,034 |
| Beaver | 5.3% | 25.8% | 74.2% | 37.8% | 32.2% | 54.4% | $64,266 |
| Beckham | 16.5% | 42.1% | 57.9% | 36.9% | 54.3% | 39.1% | $52,323 |
| Blaine | 12.7% | 50.3% | 49.7% | 28.0% | 46.5% | 48.4% | $59,304 |
| Bryan | 12.3% | 36.7% | 63.3% | 27.8% | 58.9% | 50.3% | $54,280 |
| Caddo | 15.1% | 45.9% | 54.1% | 28.1% | 46.4% | 49.9% | $52,817 |
| Canadian | 7.5% | 36.1% | 63.9% | 24.6% | 50.3% | 61.5% | $85,427 |
| Carter | 15.2% | 46.2% | 53.8% | 31.6% | 59.7% | 54.4% | $58,856 |
| Cherokee | 15.9% | 42.6% | 57.4% | 41.8% | 64.2% | 50.7% | $53,668 |
| Choctaw | 23.4% | 59.5% | 40.5% | 36.6% | 56.9% | 39.2% | $45,456 |
| Cimarron | 8.7% | 34.4% | 65.6% | 67.2% | 70.5% | 49.2% | $57,204 |
| Cleveland | 9.4% | 28.3% | 71.7% | 32.9% | 49.2% | 63.0% | $74,446 |
| Coal | 18.3% | 51.2% | 48.8% | 42.3% | 65.1% | 45.0% | $48,162 |
| Comanche | 15.7% | 52.1% | 47.9% | 28.1% | 57.0% | 44.1% | $59,000 |
| Cotton | 17.3% | 52.7% | 47.3% | 44.9% | 68.1% | 41.5% | $60,313 |
| Craig | 14.2% | 46.3% | 53.7% | 31.6% | 59.8% | 45.9% | $50,182 |
| Creek | 14.0% | 45.7% | 54.3% | 30.2% | 41.5% | 52.4% | $61,849 |
| Custer | 12.0% | 29.5% | 70.5% | 34.2% | 35.2% | 55.7% | $57,562 |
| Delaware | 15.1% | 44.3% | 55.7% | 34.9% | 57.1% | 48.1% | $55,114 |
| Dewey | 9.2% | 24.4% | 75.6% | 51.0% | 59.2% | 65.3% | $60,550 |
| Ellis | 10.6% | 41.0% | 59.0% | 18.3% | 52.9% | 45.1% | $56,992 |
| Garfield | 14.9% | 44.0% | 56.0% | 26.4% | 56.1% | 63.9% | $67,302 |
| Garvin | 12.0% | 49.6% | 50.4% | 34.9% | 54.3% | 37.1% | $57,127 |
| Grady | 11.9% | 46.4% | 53.6% | 33.3% | 61.2% | 51.9% | $75,730 |
| Grant | 9.5% | 40.6% | 59.4% | 57.4% | 72.3% | 31.8% | $61,824 |
| Greer | 22.1% | 49.9% | 50.1% | 35.0% | 36.2% | 57.4% | $60,183 |
| Harmon | 20.4% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 38.1% | 61.3% | 67.5% | $54,286 |
| Harper | 6.7% | 19.3% | 80.7% | 39.3% | 63.1% | 56.0% | $59,191 |
| Haskell | 20.6% | 51.4% | 48.6% | 34.0% | 50.4% | 48.9% | $49,930 |
| Hughes | 14.3% | 38.8% | 61.2% | 38.0% | 59.5% | 48.9% | $47,923 |
| Jackson | 14.2% | 52.1% | 47.9% | 31.7% | 46.0% | 48.7% | $61,497 |
| Jefferson | 23.9% | 57.5% | 42.5% | 38.8% | 60.1% | 43.2% | $48,750 |
| Johnston | 18.0% | 57.3% | 42.7% | 37.5% | 69.6% | 37.8% | $50,911 |
| Kay | 17.7% | 53.0% | 47.0% | 28.2% | 45.7% | 56.0% | $56,673 |
| Kingfisher | 7.0% | 28.6% | 71.4% | 9.9% | 42.2% | 53.7% | $70,617 |
| Kiowa | 22.2% | 51.2% | 48.8% | 39.6% | 53.5% | 44.6% | $42,063 |
| Latimer | 18.7% | 49.0% | 51.0% | 30.8% | 50.6% | 47.7% | $41,048 |
| Le Flore | 20.8% | 52.0% | 48.0% | 36.9% | 56.4% | 50.5% | $50,027 |
| Lincoln | 14.8% | 48.0% | 52.0% | 34.7% | 54.8% | 49.6% | $59,425 |
| Logan | 10.3% | 47.7% | 52.3% | 42.6% | 43.7% | 44.3% | $82,735 |
| Love | 13.7% | 42.5% | 57.5% | 35.4% | 65.8% | 52.4% | $62,940 |
| Major | 11.8% | 44.8% | 55.2% | 15.3% | 55.7% | 59.1% | $69,229 |
| Marshall | 12.8% | 34.0% | 66.0% | 44.7% | 62.5% | 56.4% | $56,495 |
| Mayes | 14.9% | 47.4% | 52.6% | 34.6% | 59.6% | 49.1% | $57,279 |
| McClain | 8.2% | 26.9% | 73.1% | 26.3% | 49.0% | 74.5% | $84,778 |
| McCurtain | 20.2% | 50.8% | 49.2% | 30.9% | 52.3% | 45.5% | $50,175 |
| McIntosh | 20.5% | 46.1% | 53.9% | 44.0% | 55.8% | 50.3% | $46,203 |
| Murray | 11.8% | 38.8% | 61.2% | 38.4% | 61.6% | 54.1% | $61,904 |
| Muskogee | 19.9% | 50.3% | 49.7% | 37.1% | 57.6% | 51.8% | $51,999 |
| Noble | 10.2% | 51.4% | 48.6% | 52.2% | 36.1% | 47.3% | $70,071 |
| Nowata | 17.7% | 55.6% | 44.4% | 25.0% | 48.4% | 47.3% | $52,679 |
| Okfuskee | 19.5% | 44.8% | 55.2% | 38.8% | 54.3% | 46.3% | $45,441 |
| Oklahoma | 14.3% | 47.5% | 52.5% | 27.3% | 46.0% | 49.1% | $65,374 |
| Okmulgee | 20.9% | 53.5% | 46.5% | 33.4% | 56.9% | 54.6% | $53,123 |
| Osage | 12.8% | 50.1% | 49.9% | 36.9% | 48.8% | 51.1% | $60,482 |
| Ottawa | 17.6% | 49.8% | 50.2% | 29.3% | 59.5% | 45.6% | $48,656 |
| Pawnee | 13.2% | 36.1% | 63.9% | 42.0% | 53.6% | 52.1% | $57,551 |
| Payne | 9.9% | 20.6% | 79.4% | 25.8% | 53.7% | 49.2% | $48,937 |
| Pittsburg | 17.3% | 52.4% | 47.6% | 38.9% | 58.6% | 44.3% | $54,787 |
| Pontotoc | 15.1% | 46.0% | 54.0% | 36.0% | 43.7% | 57.3% | $62,564 |
| Pottawatomie | 17.6% | 50.3% | 49.7% | 34.6% | 55.6% | 55.3% | $60,828 |
| Pushmataha | 19.2% | 49.6% | 50.4% | 49.6% | 62.0% | 35.8% | $44,634 |
| Roger Mills | 9.4% | 32.2% | 67.8% | 38.1% | 64.9% | 56.0% | $62,721 |
| Rogers | 10.1% | 42.9% | 57.1% | 29.3% | 55.3% | 59.9% | $77,688 |
| Seminole | 22.1% | 52.8% | 47.2% | 40.8% | 57.4% | 41.8% | $46,191 |
| Sequoyah | 20.3% | 54.8% | 45.2% | 32.5% | 60.8% | 47.4% | $49,795 |
| Stephens | 16.5% | 47.2% | 52.8% | 33.2% | 53.4% | 49.9% | $60,236 |
| Texas | 7.2% | 16.0% | 84.0% | 16.5% | 55.3% | 56.1% | $59,275 |
| Tillman | 20.0% | 60.5% | 39.5% | 31.6% | 57.5% | 38.9% | $47,445 |
| Tulsa | 12.5% | 42.7% | 57.3% | 26.5% | 45.6% | 51.8% | $67,317 |
| Wagoner | 8.5% | 41.0% | 59.0% | 35.3% | 64.0% | 58.3% | $78,520 |
| Washington | 14.5% | 50.3% | 49.7% | 30.5% | 52.7% | 49.7% | $61,205 |
| Washita | 13.7% | 51.5% | 48.5% | 29.0% | 54.4% | 56.8% | $61,980 |
| Woods | 12.1% | 39.2% | 60.8% | 23.0% | 43.5% | 40.6% | $50,512 |
| Woodward | 9.0% | 39.1% | 60.9% | 39.3% | 50.5% | 47.6% | $65,060 |
Apply for SNAP in Oklahoma
If you or someone you know may qualify, our state-specific guide walks through eligibility, documents needed, and how to apply online.
Oklahoma SNAP guideFind a local food pantry
While SNAP is the largest safety net, food pantries bridge immediate gaps. Search our directory of verified pantries across Oklahoma.
Oklahoma food pantriesSibling atlas
WIC coverage in Oklahoma
SNAP recipients are automatically income-eligible for WIC through adjunctive eligibility. See where Oklahoma is closing — or missing — the WIC coverage gap for pregnant women, infants, and children under 5.
Open the Oklahoma WIC Coverage Atlas