PantryPath Research · Rural & Persistent Poverty Atlas
Rural poverty in Tennessee
6 persistent-poverty countiesTennessee has 6 persistent-poverty counties and 51 nonmetro counties — home to 108,974 residents living in counties with 30+ years of 20%-or-higher poverty. The state's all-ages poverty rate is 13.8% and child poverty is 18.7%.
6
Persistent-poverty counties
51
Nonmetro counties (RUCC 4–9)
109K
Residents in PPCs
95
Total counties
Tennessee by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between the rural hunger risk score, all-ages poverty, child poverty, the Rural-Urban Continuum Code, and the binary persistent-poverty flag. Hover a county for its ERS typology and ACS poverty rate.
Loading county map…
Tennessee at a glance
Poverty rate
13.8%
All ages, ACS S1701
Child poverty
18.7%
Under 18
PPC share
6.3%
Of counties in state
Nonmetro share
53.7%
RUCC 4–9
Pantries / 100K
1.96
PantryPath verified
Risk score (mean)
0.22
Composite 0–1
"Pantries / 100K" divides Tennessee's 137 verified PantryPath pantries by the state population — a minimum-density indicator, not a saturated census. See methodology.
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 95 in Tennessee.
Highest rural hunger risk
Composite 0–1 score
- 1 Lake 0.73
- 2 Hancock 0.69
- 3 Scott 0.66
- 4 Johnson 0.65
- 5 Fentress 0.65
Highest poverty rate
ACS all-ages
- 1 Lake 32.3%
- 2 Hancock 31.5%
- 3 Pickett 25.8%
- 4 Bledsoe 25.0%
- 5 Scott 24.9%
Persistent-poverty counties
PPCs ranked by current poverty
- 1 Lake 32.3%
- 2 Hancock 31.5%
- 3 Scott 24.9%
- 4 Johnson 22.1%
- 5 Fentress 20.9%
Every county in Tennessee
All 95 counties with RUCC, typology flags, and ACS poverty data.
| County | RUCC | PPC | Flags | Poverty | Child poverty | Population | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson | 2 | — | — | 14.8% | 18.5% | 78,175 | 0.10 |
| Bedford | 4 | — | — | 13.6% | 22.8% | 51,291 | 0.17 |
| Benton | 9 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 18.5% | 25.2% | 15,948 | 0.37 |
| Bledsoe | 8 | — | Low emp., Low ed., Retire. | 25.0% | 39.0% | 14,905 | 0.36 |
| Blount | 2 | — | Retire. | 8.9% | 11.2% | 137,747 | 0.07 |
| Bradley | 3 | — | — | 13.1% | 15.7% | 109,743 | 0.13 |
| Campbell | 2 | — | Low ed. | 19.2% | 21.2% | 39,568 | 0.11 |
| Cannon | 1 | — | — | 16.5% | 23.2% | 14,661 | 0.07 |
| Carroll | 6 | — | Pop. loss | 16.4% | 20.9% | 28,461 | 0.25 |
| Carter | 3 | — | — | 18.0% | 25.6% | 56,462 | 0.15 |
| Cheatham | 1 | — | — | 8.1% | 8.4% | 41,500 | 0.03 |
| Chester | 3 | — | — | 15.6% | 21.1% | 17,452 | 0.14 |
| Claiborne | 6 | — | — | 18.2% | 21.4% | 32,221 | 0.26 |
| Clay | 8 | — | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 21.7% | 17.8% | 7,621 | 0.35 |
| Cocke | 6 | Yes | Low ed., Retire. | 20.3% | 35.3% | 36,503 | 0.57 |
| Coffee | 4 | — | — | 16.1% | 20.8% | 58,940 | 0.18 |
| Crockett | 3 | — | — | 14.8% | 27.1% | 13,937 | 0.13 |
| Cumberland | 4 | — | Retire. | 13.4% | 18.5% | 62,529 | 0.17 |
| Davidson | 1 | — | Housing | 13.9% | 20.7% | 709,846 | 0.06 |
| Decatur | 9 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 21.6% | 25.8% | 11,499 | 0.39 |
| DeKalb | 8 | — | Low ed., Housing, Retire. | 21.4% | 31.5% | 20,551 | 0.35 |
| Dickson | 1 | — | — | 9.9% | 11.0% | 55,197 | 0.04 |
| Dyer | 6 | — | — | 17.9% | 20.0% | 36,681 | 0.26 |
| Fayette | 1 | — | Retire. | 10.8% | 18.4% | 42,653 | 0.04 |
| Fentress | 8 | Yes | Retire. | 20.9% | 29.3% | 18,948 | 0.65 |
| Franklin | 7 | — | — | 12.7% | 19.9% | 43,478 | 0.28 |
| Gibson | 3 | — | — | 13.4% | 14.5% | 50,610 | 0.13 |
| Giles | 6 | — | — | 14.3% | 20.4% | 30,442 | 0.24 |
| Grainger | 2 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 16.4% | 24.2% | 23,929 | 0.10 |
| Greene | 4 | — | — | 15.2% | 20.4% | 70,919 | 0.17 |
| Grundy | 8 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 19.2% | 21.0% | 13,665 | 0.34 |
| Hamblen | 3 | — | — | 17.2% | 23.7% | 64,930 | 0.14 |
| Hamilton | 2 | — | — | 12.5% | 19.0% | 370,913 | 0.09 |
| Hancock | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Retire. | 31.5% | 37.9% | 6,790 | 0.69 |
| Hardeman | 6 | — | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 17.3% | 26.8% | 25,477 | 0.26 |
| Hardin | 6 | — | Retire. | 20.8% | 24.2% | 26,939 | 0.27 |
| Hawkins | 2 | — | — | 17.1% | 23.6% | 57,446 | 0.11 |
| Haywood | 6 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 22.8% | 32.6% | 17,672 | 0.28 |
| Henderson | 6 | — | Low ed. | 16.8% | 19.9% | 27,906 | 0.25 |
| Henry | 7 | — | Retire. | 18.3% | 29.4% | 32,345 | 0.30 |
| Hickman | 1 | — | Low ed. | 14.1% | 18.8% | 25,229 | 0.06 |
| Houston | 8 | — | Low ed. | 13.8% | 9.1% | 8,293 | 0.32 |
| Humphreys | 8 | — | — | 13.7% | 22.4% | 19,074 | 0.32 |
| Jackson | 8 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 20.7% | 21.8% | 11,882 | 0.35 |
| Jefferson | 3 | — | Retire. | 11.5% | 16.3% | 55,835 | 0.12 |
| Johnson | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 22.1% | 43.3% | 18,073 | 0.65 |
| Knox | 2 | — | — | 12.2% | 13.7% | 487,401 | 0.09 |
| Lake | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 32.3% | 41.1% | 6,691 | 0.73 |
| Lauderdale | 6 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 18.7% | 24.2% | 24,933 | 0.26 |
| Lawrence | 6 | — | — | 15.3% | 17.9% | 44,901 | 0.25 |
| Lewis | 8 | — | — | 15.9% | 12.1% | 12,784 | 0.33 |
| Lincoln | 6 | — | — | 12.4% | 15.8% | 35,617 | 0.24 |
| Loudon | 2 | — | Retire. | 12.6% | 23.5% | 56,996 | 0.09 |
| Macon | 1 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 15.2% | 19.8% | 25,793 | 0.06 |
| Madison | 3 | — | Housing | 18.6% | 29.7% | 98,845 | 0.15 |
| Marion | 2 | — | — | 16.9% | 20.8% | 29,010 | 0.11 |
| Marshall | 6 | — | — | 14.2% | 22.9% | 35,276 | 0.24 |
| Maury | 1 | — | Retire. | 9.9% | 14.1% | 104,855 | 0.04 |
| McMinn | 4 | — | — | 13.3% | 18.3% | 54,135 | 0.17 |
| McNairy | 8 | — | Low ed. | 16.1% | 17.6% | 25,933 | 0.33 |
| Meigs | 8 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 14.3% | 9.6% | 13,076 | 0.32 |
| Monroe | 6 | — | Retire. | 16.1% | 23.0% | 47,054 | 0.25 |
| Montgomery | 2 | — | — | 11.6% | 14.8% | 227,957 | 0.08 |
| Moore | 9 | — | — | 11.3% | 6.6% | 6,611 | 0.35 |
| Morgan | 2 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 18.8% | 25.9% | 21,193 | 0.11 |
| Obion | 7 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 17.0% | 21.2% | 30,570 | 0.29 |
| Overton | 9 | — | Low ed. | 18.0% | 21.3% | 22,807 | 0.37 |
| Perry | 9 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 17.7% | 33.7% | 8,561 | 0.37 |
| Pickett | 9 | — | Retire. | 25.8% | 38.4% | 5,062 | 0.40 |
| Polk | 3 | — | Retire. | 13.3% | 16.3% | 17,702 | 0.13 |
| Putnam | 4 | — | — | 16.9% | 21.4% | 81,366 | 0.18 |
| Rhea | 6 | — | — | 15.3% | 19.5% | 33,299 | 0.25 |
| Roane | 2 | — | — | 12.7% | 16.5% | 54,403 | 0.09 |
| Robertson | 1 | — | — | 10.2% | 13.5% | 74,291 | 0.04 |
| Rutherford | 1 | — | — | 9.2% | 10.6% | 351,591 | 0.04 |
| Scott | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 24.9% | 33.0% | 21,969 | 0.66 |
| Sequatchie | 2 | — | Retire. | 23.6% | 39.8% | 16,409 | 0.13 |
| Sevier | 4 | — | Retire. | 13.6% | 20.3% | 98,802 | 0.17 |
| Shelby | 1 | — | Housing | 17.5% | 25.8% | 922,195 | 0.07 |
| Smith | 1 | — | — | 13.3% | 17.2% | 20,196 | 0.05 |
| Stewart | 2 | — | — | 12.0% | 15.4% | 13,859 | 0.09 |
| Sullivan | 2 | — | — | 14.9% | 24.5% | 159,693 | 0.10 |
| Sumner | 1 | — | — | 9.0% | 12.9% | 200,553 | 0.04 |
| Tipton | 1 | — | — | 11.6% | 17.3% | 61,339 | 0.05 |
| Trousdale | 1 | — | Low emp., Low ed., Housing | 10.3% | 12.9% | 11,805 | 0.04 |
| Unicoi | 3 | — | — | 14.2% | 17.3% | 17,779 | 0.13 |
| Union | 2 | — | Low ed. | 13.9% | 21.5% | 20,141 | 0.09 |
| Van Buren | 9 | — | Low ed., Retire. | 13.8% | 15.0% | 6,293 | 0.36 |
| Warren | 6 | — | Low ed. | 15.3% | 19.1% | 41,587 | 0.25 |
| Washington | 3 | — | — | 15.8% | 17.3% | 134,693 | 0.14 |
| Wayne | 8 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 18.5% | 19.7% | 16,251 | 0.34 |
| Weakley | 6 | — | — | 19.3% | 26.0% | 32,959 | 0.26 |
| White | 7 | — | Retire. | 14.7% | 18.1% | 27,764 | 0.28 |
| Williamson | 1 | — | — | 4.5% | 4.4% | 254,609 | 0.02 |
| Wilson | 1 | — | Retire. | 7.6% | 9.1% | 153,587 | 0.03 |
Find a food pantry in Tennessee
Search Tennessee's 137 verified pantries, food banks, and meal programs — filtered by city, open-now status, and service type.
Tennessee pantry directoryTennessee SNAP
Income limits, application steps, and EBT card details for residents of persistent-poverty counties and beyond.
Tennessee SNAP guideEmergency food help
National hotlines, 211 referrals, and same-day food options — critical in rural counties where the nearest pantry may be 30+ miles away.
Emergency foodFood deserts atlas
Rural poverty and low food access often overlap. Compare persistent-poverty counties to USDA's low-income / low-access food desert designations.
Tennessee food desertsMethodology
How we combined USDA ERS typology codes, the Rural-Urban Continuum, ACS poverty data, and PantryPath's own pantry directory — plus the risk-score formula.
Full methodology