PantryPath Research · Rural & Persistent Poverty Atlas
Rural poverty in South Carolina
9 persistent-poverty countiesSouth Carolina has 9 persistent-poverty counties and 20 nonmetro counties — home to 260,452 residents living in counties with 30+ years of 20%-or-higher poverty. The state's all-ages poverty rate is 14.2% and child poverty is 19.7%.
9
Persistent-poverty counties
20
Nonmetro counties (RUCC 4–9)
260K
Residents in PPCs
46
Total counties
South Carolina by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between the rural hunger risk score, all-ages poverty, child poverty, the Rural-Urban Continuum Code, and the binary persistent-poverty flag. Hover a county for its ERS typology and ACS poverty rate.
Loading county map…
South Carolina at a glance
Poverty rate
14.2%
All ages, ACS S1701
Child poverty
19.7%
Under 18
PPC share
19.6%
Of counties in state
Nonmetro share
43.5%
RUCC 4–9
Pantries / 100K
1.52
PantryPath verified
Risk score (mean)
0.24
Composite 0–1
"Pantries / 100K" divides South Carolina's 79 verified PantryPath pantries by the state population — a minimum-density indicator, not a saturated census. See methodology.
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 46 in South Carolina.
Highest rural hunger risk
Composite 0–1 score
- 1 Barnwell 0.68
- 2 Allendale 0.67
- 3 Lee 0.66
- 4 Hampton 0.64
- 5 Dillon 0.60
Highest poverty rate
ACS all-ages
- 1 Dillon 29.2%
- 2 Barnwell 28.5%
- 3 Marion 27.3%
- 4 Allendale 26.5%
- 5 Marlboro 26.2%
Persistent-poverty counties
PPCs ranked by current poverty
- 1 Dillon 29.2%
- 2 Barnwell 28.5%
- 3 Marion 27.3%
- 4 Allendale 26.5%
- 5 Marlboro 26.2%
Every county in South Carolina
All 46 counties with RUCC, typology flags, and ACS poverty data.
| County | RUCC | PPC | Flags | Poverty | Child poverty | Population | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abbeville | 6 | — | Pop. loss | 14.1% | 22.4% | 24,352 | 0.24 |
| Aiken | 2 | — | — | 13.9% | 18.6% | 171,949 | 0.09 |
| Allendale | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss, Housing | 26.5% | 28.7% | 7,738 | 0.67 |
| Anderson | 2 | — | — | 14.4% | 21.3% | 207,218 | 0.10 |
| Bamberg | 9 | — | Pop. loss | 21.6% | 26.1% | 13,164 | 0.39 |
| Barnwell | 8 | Yes | Pop. loss | 28.5% | 49.4% | 20,565 | 0.68 |
| Beaufort | 3 | — | Housing, Retire. | 10.5% | 18.4% | 192,123 | 0.12 |
| Berkeley | 2 | — | Retire. | 10.3% | 14.5% | 238,723 | 0.08 |
| Calhoun | 2 | — | Pop. loss | 16.3% | 25.0% | 14,150 | 0.10 |
| Charleston | 2 | — | Housing, Retire. | 11.6% | 15.9% | 414,711 | 0.08 |
| Cherokee | 6 | — | — | 18.5% | 28.8% | 56,299 | 0.26 |
| Chester | 1 | — | Pop. loss | 19.3% | 28.5% | 32,177 | 0.08 |
| Chesterfield | 6 | — | Low ed. | 20.2% | 27.3% | 43,575 | 0.27 |
| Clarendon | 8 | — | — | 18.5% | 26.3% | 31,037 | 0.34 |
| Colleton | 6 | — | — | 18.7% | 24.9% | 38,623 | 0.26 |
| Darlington | 3 | — | — | 20.3% | 32.2% | 62,754 | 0.16 |
| Dillon | 6 | Yes | Low ed. | 29.2% | 43.3% | 28,031 | 0.60 |
| Dorchester | 2 | — | — | 11.5% | 16.6% | 164,322 | 0.08 |
| Edgefield | 2 | — | Low emp. | 16.4% | 22.5% | 26,508 | 0.10 |
| Fairfield | 2 | — | — | 16.9% | 25.3% | 20,741 | 0.11 |
| Florence | 3 | — | — | 18.3% | 24.4% | 136,921 | 0.15 |
| Georgetown | 4 | — | Retire. | 14.4% | 26.1% | 64,200 | 0.17 |
| Greenville | 2 | — | — | 11.0% | 14.8% | 537,575 | 0.08 |
| Greenwood | 4 | — | — | 17.1% | 25.7% | 69,329 | 0.18 |
| Hampton | 8 | Yes | Low ed., Pop. loss | 20.0% | 26.6% | 18,555 | 0.64 |
| Horry | 2 | — | Retire. | 12.8% | 19.7% | 368,937 | 0.09 |
| Jasper | 3 | — | Housing, Retire. | 18.3% | 26.5% | 30,658 | 0.15 |
| Kershaw | 2 | — | — | 14.1% | 21.0% | 66,924 | 0.09 |
| Lancaster | 1 | — | Retire. | 12.3% | 15.0% | 100,905 | 0.05 |
| Laurens | 2 | — | — | 17.6% | 24.9% | 67,904 | 0.11 |
| Lee | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 23.3% | 36.4% | 16,330 | 0.66 |
| Lexington | 2 | — | — | 11.4% | 15.2% | 300,370 | 0.08 |
| Marion | 6 | Yes | Low ed., Pop. loss | 27.3% | 41.7% | 28,900 | 0.60 |
| Marlboro | 6 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 26.2% | 32.3% | 26,285 | 0.59 |
| McCormick | 8 | — | Low emp., Retire. | 18.0% | 39.5% | 9,701 | 0.33 |
| Newberry | 6 | — | — | 16.0% | 25.9% | 38,121 | 0.25 |
| Oconee | 4 | — | Retire. | 16.4% | 22.9% | 79,566 | 0.18 |
| Orangeburg | 4 | Yes | — | 23.9% | 34.5% | 83,531 | 0.51 |
| Pickens | 2 | — | — | 17.2% | 15.6% | 132,604 | 0.11 |
| Richland | 2 | — | Housing | 16.9% | 22.5% | 418,725 | 0.11 |
| Saluda | 2 | — | — | 19.4% | 26.0% | 18,958 | 0.12 |
| Spartanburg | 2 | — | — | 14.5% | 19.5% | 338,096 | 0.10 |
| Sumter | 3 | — | — | 16.4% | 19.8% | 104,853 | 0.14 |
| Union | 2 | — | Pop. loss | 22.7% | 38.4% | 26,990 | 0.13 |
| Williamsburg | 6 | Yes | Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 23.6% | 28.5% | 30,517 | 0.58 |
| York | 1 | — | — | 8.9% | 11.3% | 288,559 | 0.04 |
Find a food pantry in South Carolina
Search South Carolina's 79 verified pantries, food banks, and meal programs — filtered by city, open-now status, and service type.
South Carolina pantry directorySouth Carolina SNAP
Income limits, application steps, and EBT card details for residents of persistent-poverty counties and beyond.
South Carolina SNAP guideEmergency food help
National hotlines, 211 referrals, and same-day food options — critical in rural counties where the nearest pantry may be 30+ miles away.
Emergency foodFood deserts atlas
Rural poverty and low food access often overlap. Compare persistent-poverty counties to USDA's low-income / low-access food desert designations.
South Carolina food desertsMethodology
How we combined USDA ERS typology codes, the Rural-Urban Continuum, ACS poverty data, and PantryPath's own pantry directory — plus the risk-score formula.
Full methodology