PantryPath Research · Rural & Persistent Poverty Atlas
Rural poverty in Kentucky
39 persistent-poverty countiesKentucky has 39 persistent-poverty counties and 81 nonmetro counties — home to 704,713 residents living in counties with 30+ years of 20%-or-higher poverty. The state's all-ages poverty rate is 16.1% and child poverty is 20.9%.
39
Persistent-poverty counties
81
Nonmetro counties (RUCC 4–9)
705K
Residents in PPCs
120
Total counties
Kentucky by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between the rural hunger risk score, all-ages poverty, child poverty, the Rural-Urban Continuum Code, and the binary persistent-poverty flag. Hover a county for its ERS typology and ACS poverty rate.
Loading county map…
Kentucky at a glance
Poverty rate
16.1%
All ages, ACS S1701
Child poverty
20.9%
Under 18
PPC share
32.5%
Of counties in state
Nonmetro share
67.5%
RUCC 4–9
Pantries / 100K
1.77
PantryPath verified
Risk score (mean)
0.35
Composite 0–1
"Pantries / 100K" divides Kentucky's 80 verified PantryPath pantries by the state population — a minimum-density indicator, not a saturated census. See methodology.
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 120 in Kentucky.
Highest rural hunger risk
Composite 0–1 score
- 1 Wolfe 0.75
- 2 McCreary 0.74
- 3 Cumberland 0.74
- 4 Magoffin 0.73
- 5 Clay 0.73
Highest poverty rate
ACS all-ages
- 1 Wolfe 38.1%
- 2 Knox 36.7%
- 3 McCreary 35.1%
- 4 Cumberland 33.9%
- 5 Magoffin 33.4%
Persistent-poverty counties
PPCs ranked by current poverty
- 1 Wolfe 38.1%
- 2 Knox 36.7%
- 3 McCreary 35.1%
- 4 Cumberland 33.9%
- 5 Magoffin 33.4%
Every county in Kentucky
All 120 counties with RUCC, typology flags, and ACS poverty data.
| County | RUCC | PPC | Flags | Poverty | Child poverty | Population | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adair | 7 | — | — | 18.0% | 23.8% | 19,016 | 0.30 |
| Allen | 3 | — | — | 15.0% | 21.5% | 21,029 | 0.14 |
| Anderson | 6 | — | — | 12.5% | 14.8% | 24,098 | 0.24 |
| Ballard | 3 | — | Pop. loss | 13.8% | 16.7% | 7,678 | 0.13 |
| Barren | 6 | — | — | 21.0% | 29.5% | 44,670 | 0.27 |
| Bath | 8 | Yes | Low ed. | 23.5% | 31.6% | 12,812 | 0.66 |
| Bell | 7 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 27.1% | 28.4% | 23,878 | 0.63 |
| Boone | 1 | — | — | 6.6% | 7.4% | 137,676 | 0.03 |
| Bourbon | 2 | — | Housing | 13.7% | 11.1% | 20,174 | 0.09 |
| Boyd | 2 | — | Pop. loss | 17.7% | 24.4% | 48,043 | 0.11 |
| Boyle | 7 | — | — | 14.2% | 15.3% | 30,708 | 0.28 |
| Bracken | 1 | — | — | 20.1% | 32.9% | 8,427 | 0.08 |
| Breathitt | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 28.2% | 37.5% | 13,438 | 0.71 |
| Breckinridge | 8 | — | — | 21.3% | 27.9% | 20,722 | 0.35 |
| Bullitt | 1 | — | — | 9.5% | 13.5% | 83,209 | 0.04 |
| Butler | 3 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 18.6% | 23.3% | 12,373 | 0.15 |
| Caldwell | 7 | — | Pop. loss | 13.9% | 13.6% | 12,631 | 0.28 |
| Calloway | 7 | — | — | 17.2% | 18.3% | 37,882 | 0.29 |
| Campbell | 1 | — | — | 10.8% | 10.6% | 93,193 | 0.04 |
| Carlisle | 3 | — | Pop. loss | 16.7% | 27.0% | 4,763 | 0.14 |
| Carroll | 6 | — | Low ed. | 18.9% | 25.8% | 10,878 | 0.26 |
| Carter | 2 | — | Low emp. | 19.6% | 25.2% | 26,515 | 0.12 |
| Casey | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 24.4% | 29.6% | 15,951 | 0.70 |
| Christian | 2 | — | Low emp., Housing | 17.2% | 18.8% | 72,599 | 0.11 |
| Clark | 2 | — | — | 12.9% | 18.0% | 37,004 | 0.09 |
| Clay | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 31.8% | 47.4% | 20,105 | 0.73 |
| Clinton | 9 | Yes | — | 18.4% | 23.0% | 9,240 | 0.67 |
| Crittenden | 8 | — | Pop. loss | 18.1% | 33.4% | 8,972 | 0.33 |
| Cumberland | 9 | Yes | Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 33.9% | 35.2% | 5,948 | 0.74 |
| Daviess | 3 | — | — | 15.2% | 20.5% | 103,195 | 0.14 |
| Edmonson | 3 | — | Low ed. | 16.8% | 22.7% | 12,243 | 0.14 |
| Elliott | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 27.2% | 45.3% | 7,336 | 0.67 |
| Estill | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 22.0% | 25.3% | 14,079 | 0.65 |
| Fayette | 2 | — | Housing | 15.7% | 19.3% | 321,122 | 0.10 |
| Fleming | 9 | — | — | 22.9% | 29.3% | 15,221 | 0.39 |
| Floyd | 7 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 26.6% | 38.7% | 35,342 | 0.63 |
| Franklin | 4 | — | — | 13.4% | 20.9% | 51,563 | 0.17 |
| Fulton | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 25.7% | 45.7% | 6,440 | 0.70 |
| Gallatin | 1 | — | Low ed. | 14.4% | 20.2% | 8,749 | 0.06 |
| Garrard | 8 | — | — | 17.1% | 25.0% | 17,346 | 0.33 |
| Grant | 1 | — | — | 12.3% | 14.0% | 25,238 | 0.05 |
| Graves | 6 | — | — | 20.5% | 25.7% | 36,612 | 0.27 |
| Grayson | 6 | — | Low ed. | 19.3% | 28.3% | 26,586 | 0.26 |
| Green | 8 | — | Pop. loss | 21.5% | 25.8% | 11,278 | 0.35 |
| Greenup | 2 | — | — | 15.1% | 18.6% | 35,639 | 0.10 |
| Hancock | 8 | — | — | 15.9% | 19.6% | 9,032 | 0.33 |
| Hardin | 3 | — | — | 11.7% | 12.4% | 111,452 | 0.12 |
| Harlan | 7 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss | 27.2% | 33.4% | 26,185 | 0.63 |
| Harrison | 6 | — | — | 16.4% | 16.4% | 18,971 | 0.25 |
| Hart | 8 | Yes | Low ed. | 21.2% | 27.5% | 19,470 | 0.65 |
| Henderson | 4 | — | — | 15.4% | 22.7% | 44,493 | 0.17 |
| Henry | 1 | — | Low ed., Housing | 16.6% | 22.7% | 15,774 | 0.07 |
| Hickman | 8 | — | Pop. loss | 20.8% | 43.7% | 4,470 | 0.35 |
| Hopkins | 5 | — | — | 19.2% | 29.3% | 45,143 | 0.23 |
| Jackson | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 23.0% | 16.1% | 13,003 | 0.69 |
| Jefferson | 1 | — | — | 14.5% | 20.7% | 777,392 | 0.06 |
| Jessamine | 2 | — | — | 10.5% | 13.7% | 53,792 | 0.08 |
| Johnson | 7 | Yes | Pop. loss | 23.4% | 29.3% | 22,464 | 0.62 |
| Kenton | 1 | — | — | 11.9% | 18.2% | 169,817 | 0.05 |
| Knott | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss | 25.9% | 34.6% | 14,046 | 0.70 |
| Knox | 7 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 36.7% | 50.2% | 30,034 | 0.67 |
| Larue | 3 | — | — | 18.9% | 30.4% | 15,028 | 0.15 |
| Laurel | 5 | Yes | — | 21.3% | 27.4% | 62,731 | 0.54 |
| Lawrence | 2 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 22.0% | 27.1% | 16,171 | 0.43 |
| Lee | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 28.9% | 40.7% | 7,375 | 0.72 |
| Leslie | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss | 27.3% | 39.5% | 10,261 | 0.71 |
| Letcher | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss | 26.8% | 33.7% | 21,146 | 0.71 |
| Lewis | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 22.6% | 28.5% | 13,028 | 0.65 |
| Lincoln | 9 | — | Low ed. | 18.5% | 15.6% | 24,415 | 0.37 |
| Livingston | 3 | — | Pop. loss | 18.9% | 35.2% | 8,941 | 0.15 |
| Logan | 6 | — | — | 14.0% | 16.9% | 27,731 | 0.24 |
| Lyon | 8 | — | Low emp. | 10.6% | 17.2% | 8,831 | 0.30 |
| Madison | 4 | — | — | 15.8% | 18.5% | 94,064 | 0.18 |
| Magoffin | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 33.4% | 41.8% | 11,495 | 0.73 |
| Marion | 6 | — | Low ed. | 19.5% | 25.8% | 19,680 | 0.27 |
| Marshall | 8 | — | — | 13.4% | 18.9% | 31,728 | 0.32 |
| Martin | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 29.2% | 41.2% | 11,181 | 0.68 |
| Mason | 6 | — | — | 18.4% | 22.0% | 16,995 | 0.26 |
| McCracken | 3 | — | — | 15.3% | 21.9% | 67,584 | 0.14 |
| McCreary | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 35.1% | 37.5% | 16,905 | 0.74 |
| McLean | 3 | — | Pop. loss | 9.3% | 7.3% | 9,127 | 0.11 |
| Meade | 1 | — | — | 13.7% | 19.7% | 30,032 | 0.05 |
| Menifee | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss, Retire. | 28.2% | 45.2% | 6,203 | 0.71 |
| Mercer | 6 | — | — | 11.4% | 15.2% | 22,824 | 0.23 |
| Metcalfe | 9 | — | — | 25.7% | 38.6% | 10,372 | 0.40 |
| Monroe | 8 | Yes | — | 22.2% | 27.7% | 11,318 | 0.65 |
| Montgomery | 6 | — | — | 15.2% | 15.6% | 28,271 | 0.25 |
| Morgan | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 18.2% | 20.9% | 13,938 | 0.67 |
| Muhlenberg | 6 | — | Pop. loss | 17.8% | 27.2% | 30,712 | 0.26 |
| Nelson | 1 | — | — | 9.7% | 13.6% | 47,102 | 0.04 |
| Nicholas | 8 | — | Low ed. | 18.5% | 15.5% | 7,655 | 0.34 |
| Ohio | 6 | — | — | 13.1% | 16.9% | 23,704 | 0.24 |
| Oldham | 1 | — | — | 4.0% | 4.2% | 68,600 | 0.02 |
| Owen | 8 | — | — | 17.2% | 17.7% | 11,270 | 0.33 |
| Owsley | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 24.9% | 15.5% | 4,021 | 0.70 |
| Pendleton | 1 | — | — | 14.3% | 9.9% | 14,683 | 0.06 |
| Perry | 7 | Yes | Pop. loss | 25.5% | 31.4% | 27,847 | 0.63 |
| Pike | 7 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss | 25.0% | 33.3% | 57,466 | 0.63 |
| Powell | 8 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 21.7% | 28.6% | 13,057 | 0.35 |
| Pulaski | 5 | — | — | 20.3% | 26.1% | 65,503 | 0.23 |
| Robertson | 8 | Yes | Housing | 27.4% | 25.0% | 2,239 | 0.67 |
| Rockcastle | 9 | Yes | Low ed. | 24.4% | 32.0% | 16,144 | 0.70 |
| Rowan | 6 | Yes | — | 24.5% | 32.5% | 24,525 | 0.59 |
| Russell | 9 | Yes | — | 23.4% | 27.4% | 18,117 | 0.69 |
| Scott | 2 | — | — | 10.4% | 13.9% | 58,269 | 0.08 |
| Shelby | 1 | — | — | 8.6% | 11.3% | 48,599 | 0.03 |
| Simpson | 6 | — | — | 15.1% | 11.7% | 19,786 | 0.25 |
| Spencer | 1 | — | — | 7.4% | 9.1% | 19,875 | 0.03 |
| Taylor | 7 | — | — | 16.6% | 21.9% | 26,205 | 0.29 |
| Todd | 8 | — | Low ed. | 21.7% | 33.3% | 12,330 | 0.35 |
| Trigg | 2 | — | — | 20.4% | 32.8% | 14,211 | 0.12 |
| Trimble | 8 | — | — | 13.2% | 8.0% | 8,531 | 0.32 |
| Union | 8 | — | Pop. loss | 17.4% | 20.9% | 13,379 | 0.33 |
| Warren | 3 | — | — | 16.8% | 20.5% | 137,549 | 0.14 |
| Washington | 8 | — | — | 12.6% | 11.9% | 12,091 | 0.31 |
| Wayne | 7 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 24.3% | 34.6% | 19,592 | 0.62 |
| Webster | 9 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 13.9% | 12.8% | 12,873 | 0.36 |
| Whitley | 7 | Yes | — | 25.1% | 27.8% | 36,755 | 0.63 |
| Wolfe | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 38.1% | 45.2% | 6,484 | 0.75 |
| Woodford | 2 | — | — | 10.0% | 14.8% | 27,017 | 0.08 |
Find a food pantry in Kentucky
Search Kentucky's 80 verified pantries, food banks, and meal programs — filtered by city, open-now status, and service type.
Kentucky pantry directoryKentucky SNAP
Income limits, application steps, and EBT card details for residents of persistent-poverty counties and beyond.
Kentucky SNAP guideEmergency food help
National hotlines, 211 referrals, and same-day food options — critical in rural counties where the nearest pantry may be 30+ miles away.
Emergency foodFood deserts atlas
Rural poverty and low food access often overlap. Compare persistent-poverty counties to USDA's low-income / low-access food desert designations.
Kentucky food desertsMethodology
How we combined USDA ERS typology codes, the Rural-Urban Continuum, ACS poverty data, and PantryPath's own pantry directory — plus the risk-score formula.
Full methodology