PantryPath Research · Rural & Persistent Poverty Atlas
Rural poverty in Georgia
38 persistent-poverty countiesGeorgia has 38 persistent-poverty counties and 85 nonmetro counties — home to 741,875 residents living in counties with 30+ years of 20%-or-higher poverty. The state's all-ages poverty rate is 13.5% and child poverty is 18.7%.
38
Persistent-poverty counties
85
Nonmetro counties (RUCC 4–9)
742K
Residents in PPCs
159
Total counties
Georgia by county
← Back to national atlasToggle between the rural hunger risk score, all-ages poverty, child poverty, the Rural-Urban Continuum Code, and the binary persistent-poverty flag. Hover a county for its ERS typology and ACS poverty rate.
Loading county map…
Georgia at a glance
Poverty rate
13.5%
All ages, ACS S1701
Child poverty
18.7%
Under 18
PPC share
23.9%
Of counties in state
Nonmetro share
53.5%
RUCC 4–9
Pantries / 100K
1.52
PantryPath verified
Risk score (mean)
0.28
Composite 0–1
"Pantries / 100K" divides Georgia's 164 verified PantryPath pantries by the state population — a minimum-density indicator, not a saturated census. See methodology.
County-level hotspots
Top five counties across 159 in Georgia.
Highest rural hunger risk
Composite 0–1 score
- 1 Hancock 0.73
- 2 Telfair 0.72
- 3 Atkinson 0.70
- 4 Treutlen 0.70
- 5 Jenkins 0.69
Highest poverty rate
ACS all-ages
- 1 Terrell 33.0%
- 2 Hancock 31.5%
- 3 Telfair 31.0%
- 4 Baker 29.4%
- 5 Taylor 29.4%
Persistent-poverty counties
PPCs ranked by current poverty
- 1 Terrell 33.0%
- 2 Hancock 31.5%
- 3 Telfair 31.0%
- 4 Baker 29.4%
- 5 Taylor 29.4%
Every county in Georgia
All 159 counties with RUCC, typology flags, and ACS poverty data.
| County | RUCC | PPC | Flags | Poverty | Child poverty | Population | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appling | 7 | — | Low ed. | 23.8% | 34.4% | 18,426 | 0.32 |
| Atkinson | 9 | Yes | Low ed. | 25.0% | 39.6% | 8,261 | 0.70 |
| Bacon | 9 | Yes | Low emp. | 20.9% | 26.1% | 11,129 | 0.68 |
| Baker | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss | 29.4% | 28.0% | 2,830 | 0.68 |
| Baldwin | 4 | — | — | 22.0% | 22.0% | 43,669 | 0.20 |
| Banks | 8 | — | — | 12.8% | 15.4% | 18,757 | 0.31 |
| Barrow | 1 | — | — | 10.2% | 12.3% | 86,982 | 0.04 |
| Bartow | 1 | — | — | 10.1% | 12.0% | 111,153 | 0.04 |
| Ben Hill | 7 | Yes | Low ed. | 25.7% | 33.7% | 17,138 | 0.63 |
| Berrien | 8 | — | — | 22.1% | 29.6% | 18,257 | 0.35 |
| Bibb | 3 | — | Housing | 24.8% | 38.8% | 156,543 | 0.17 |
| Bleckley | 6 | — | — | 20.5% | 28.0% | 12,414 | 0.27 |
| Brantley | 3 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 16.9% | 20.5% | 18,171 | 0.14 |
| Brooks | 3 | Yes | Housing | 25.4% | 38.5% | 16,285 | 0.48 |
| Bryan | 2 | — | — | 7.2% | 8.1% | 46,681 | 0.07 |
| Bulloch | 4 | Yes | Retire. | 22.5% | 23.9% | 81,372 | 0.50 |
| Burke | 2 | — | — | 19.2% | 27.2% | 24,427 | 0.11 |
| Butts | 1 | — | Low ed. | 12.9% | 16.8% | 26,074 | 0.05 |
| Calhoun | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 22.7% | 32.1% | 5,528 | 0.65 |
| Camden | 4 | — | — | 15.0% | 22.4% | 56,036 | 0.17 |
| Candler | 9 | — | — | 17.5% | 28.0% | 10,972 | 0.37 |
| Carroll | 1 | — | — | 15.6% | 20.8% | 122,187 | 0.06 |
| Catoosa | 2 | — | — | 8.7% | 12.7% | 68,356 | 0.07 |
| Charlton | 8 | — | Low emp., Low ed., Housing | 22.5% | 35.9% | 12,711 | 0.35 |
| Chatham | 2 | — | Housing | 14.3% | 21.0% | 298,143 | 0.09 |
| Chattahoochee | 2 | — | Low emp., Pop. loss | 16.2% | 16.9% | 9,181 | 0.10 |
| Chattooga | 6 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 20.1% | 32.8% | 24,975 | 0.27 |
| Cherokee | 1 | — | Retire. | 6.5% | 7.8% | 274,539 | 0.03 |
| Clarke | 3 | Yes | Housing, Retire. | 25.9% | 23.6% | 129,267 | 0.48 |
| Clay | 9 | Yes | Pop. loss | 23.0% | 30.1% | 2,853 | 0.69 |
| Clayton | 1 | — | Housing | 16.8% | 25.1% | 298,771 | 0.07 |
| Clinch | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss | 22.9% | 22.0% | 6,722 | 0.65 |
| Cobb | 1 | — | — | 8.5% | 11.1% | 769,152 | 0.03 |
| Coffee | 7 | — | Low ed. | 19.8% | 25.8% | 43,161 | 0.30 |
| Colquitt | 6 | — | Low ed. | 23.9% | 38.5% | 45,907 | 0.28 |
| Columbia | 2 | — | — | 6.8% | 9.0% | 159,638 | 0.06 |
| Cook | 6 | Yes | Housing | 20.5% | 21.2% | 17,363 | 0.57 |
| Coweta | 1 | — | — | 8.2% | 9.8% | 150,071 | 0.03 |
| Crawford | 3 | — | — | 13.3% | 18.3% | 12,183 | 0.13 |
| Crisp | 6 | Yes | Housing | 24.1% | 39.4% | 19,995 | 0.58 |
| Dade | 2 | — | — | 8.5% | 9.7% | 16,196 | 0.07 |
| Dawson | 1 | — | Retire. | 9.2% | 13.0% | 28,704 | 0.04 |
| Decatur | 6 | Yes | Housing | 24.8% | 43.1% | 29,118 | 0.59 |
| DeKalb | 1 | — | Housing | 13.5% | 19.9% | 762,105 | 0.05 |
| Dodge | 7 | — | — | 22.2% | 23.9% | 19,909 | 0.31 |
| Dooly | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 19.7% | 43.5% | 11,026 | 0.64 |
| Dougherty | 3 | Yes | Pop. loss, Housing | 26.4% | 38.5% | 83,915 | 0.48 |
| Douglas | 1 | — | Housing | 11.3% | 15.0% | 146,141 | 0.05 |
| Early | 8 | Yes | Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 21.1% | 33.3% | 10,683 | 0.65 |
| Echols | 3 | — | Low ed. | 12.4% | 12.6% | 3,705 | 0.12 |
| Effingham | 2 | — | — | 7.4% | 7.9% | 67,265 | 0.07 |
| Elbert | 6 | — | Pop. loss | 20.6% | 35.6% | 19,725 | 0.27 |
| Emanuel | 7 | Yes | Low ed. | 24.7% | 34.6% | 22,961 | 0.62 |
| Evans | 8 | Yes | — | 18.4% | 25.8% | 10,740 | 0.64 |
| Fannin | 8 | — | Housing, Retire. | 12.0% | 21.5% | 25,605 | 0.31 |
| Fayette | 1 | — | — | 5.5% | 5.9% | 120,689 | 0.02 |
| Floyd | 3 | — | Housing | 16.8% | 25.8% | 98,985 | 0.14 |
| Forsyth | 1 | — | — | 4.5% | 5.4% | 260,062 | 0.02 |
| Franklin | 8 | — | — | 20.4% | 33.2% | 23,840 | 0.34 |
| Fulton | 1 | — | Housing | 12.9% | 18.2% | 1,068,507 | 0.05 |
| Gilmer | 6 | — | Retire. | 14.7% | 19.8% | 31,976 | 0.25 |
| Glascock | 9 | — | Housing | 12.2% | 10.2% | 2,913 | 0.35 |
| Glynn | 3 | — | Retire. | 16.3% | 27.6% | 84,987 | 0.14 |
| Gordon | 4 | — | — | 12.9% | 14.7% | 58,336 | 0.16 |
| Grady | 6 | — | Housing | 20.6% | 34.3% | 26,056 | 0.27 |
| Greene | 8 | — | Retire. | 8.8% | 19.3% | 19,586 | 0.30 |
| Gwinnett | 1 | — | Housing | 10.5% | 14.0% | 966,972 | 0.04 |
| Habersham | 6 | — | — | 13.6% | 16.1% | 46,948 | 0.24 |
| Hall | 3 | — | Housing | 12.7% | 20.2% | 208,395 | 0.13 |
| Hancock | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss, Housing | 31.5% | 67.7% | 8,630 | 0.73 |
| Haralson | 1 | — | — | 15.1% | 26.2% | 30,720 | 0.06 |
| Harris | 2 | — | — | 7.4% | 7.1% | 35,509 | 0.07 |
| Hart | 6 | — | — | 11.5% | 11.5% | 26,484 | 0.23 |
| Heard | 1 | — | Low ed. | 18.7% | 26.5% | 11,616 | 0.07 |
| Henry | 1 | — | Housing | 9.4% | 14.3% | 245,417 | 0.04 |
| Houston | 3 | — | — | 10.1% | 12.7% | 166,902 | 0.12 |
| Irwin | 9 | — | — | 18.1% | 31.6% | 9,385 | 0.37 |
| Jackson | 4 | — | Retire. | 8.3% | 8.1% | 80,640 | 0.15 |
| Jasper | 1 | — | — | 14.0% | 13.8% | 15,345 | 0.06 |
| Jeff Davis | 9 | — | Low ed. | 26.6% | 38.1% | 14,838 | 0.41 |
| Jefferson | 8 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 18.8% | 28.3% | 15,468 | 0.34 |
| Jenkins | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 23.6% | 12.4% | 8,674 | 0.69 |
| Johnson | 9 | — | Low emp., Low ed. | 17.5% | 25.5% | 9,192 | 0.37 |
| Jones | 3 | — | — | 13.5% | 18.2% | 28,526 | 0.13 |
| Lamar | 6 | — | — | 10.5% | 10.3% | 19,098 | 0.23 |
| Lanier | 3 | — | Low emp., Housing | 27.7% | 39.8% | 10,094 | 0.19 |
| Laurens | 4 | — | Housing | 22.4% | 30.8% | 49,619 | 0.20 |
| Lee | 3 | — | — | 7.0% | 8.0% | 33,337 | 0.10 |
| Liberty | 3 | — | Low emp., Housing | 14.5% | 19.4% | 66,826 | 0.13 |
| Lincoln | 2 | — | Pop. loss | 18.1% | 31.3% | 7,773 | 0.11 |
| Long | 3 | — | Housing | 16.0% | 16.7% | 17,512 | 0.14 |
| Lowndes | 3 | — | Housing | 20.3% | 27.2% | 119,055 | 0.16 |
| Lumpkin | 1 | — | — | 15.7% | 16.2% | 33,931 | 0.06 |
| Macon | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed., Housing | 25.5% | 32.7% | 11,953 | 0.66 |
| Madison | 3 | — | — | 18.9% | 24.8% | 30,914 | 0.15 |
| Marion | 2 | — | Low ed. | 16.9% | 26.8% | 7,474 | 0.11 |
| McDuffie | 2 | — | — | 19.0% | 35.3% | 21,687 | 0.11 |
| McIntosh | 3 | — | — | 22.4% | 30.8% | 11,187 | 0.16 |
| Meriwether | 1 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 19.7% | 27.0% | 20,757 | 0.08 |
| Miller | 9 | — | Pop. loss | 24.1% | 37.0% | 5,873 | 0.40 |
| Mitchell | 6 | Yes | Low emp., Pop. loss, Housing | 25.5% | 35.0% | 21,441 | 0.59 |
| Monroe | 3 | — | — | 11.4% | 15.6% | 28,919 | 0.12 |
| Montgomery | 9 | — | — | 16.4% | 24.7% | 8,675 | 0.37 |
| Morgan | 1 | — | — | 7.4% | 8.7% | 20,614 | 0.03 |
| Murray | 3 | — | — | 13.0% | 17.5% | 40,282 | 0.13 |
| Muscogee | 2 | — | Housing | 18.8% | 25.7% | 204,383 | 0.11 |
| Newton | 1 | — | Housing | 12.3% | 16.3% | 115,530 | 0.05 |
| Oconee | 3 | — | — | 6.1% | 6.8% | 42,788 | 0.10 |
| Oglethorpe | 3 | — | — | 11.2% | 17.7% | 15,221 | 0.12 |
| Paulding | 1 | — | — | 6.1% | 6.9% | 174,292 | 0.02 |
| Peach | 3 | — | — | 17.7% | 26.0% | 28,269 | 0.15 |
| Pickens | 1 | — | Retire. | 13.3% | 21.9% | 34,197 | 0.05 |
| Pierce | 8 | — | — | 13.2% | 18.7% | 19,996 | 0.32 |
| Pike | 1 | — | — | 9.6% | 8.7% | 19,540 | 0.04 |
| Polk | 4 | — | Low ed., Housing | 19.4% | 29.1% | 43,365 | 0.19 |
| Pulaski | 8 | — | Low emp., Housing | 18.3% | 28.8% | 9,893 | 0.34 |
| Putnam | 8 | — | Retire. | 18.6% | 30.4% | 22,524 | 0.34 |
| Quitman | 8 | — | Low emp., Low ed., Pop. loss, Retire. | 15.5% | 30.7% | 2,092 | 0.32 |
| Rabun | 9 | — | Retire. | 14.8% | 24.7% | 17,107 | 0.36 |
| Randolph | 8 | Yes | Pop. loss, Housing | 26.8% | 32.0% | 6,270 | 0.67 |
| Richmond | 2 | — | Housing | 21.1% | 33.1% | 206,040 | 0.12 |
| Rockdale | 1 | — | Housing | 10.7% | 14.9% | 94,293 | 0.04 |
| Schley | 8 | — | Housing | 13.2% | 11.5% | 4,539 | 0.32 |
| Screven | 8 | — | Pop. loss | 18.1% | 35.4% | 14,057 | 0.33 |
| Seminole | 8 | Yes | Retire. | 19.0% | 15.5% | 9,117 | 0.64 |
| Spalding | 1 | — | Housing | 18.7% | 31.1% | 68,215 | 0.07 |
| Stephens | 7 | — | — | 13.9% | 14.1% | 26,842 | 0.28 |
| Stewart | 2 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 27.8% | 37.9% | 4,978 | 0.45 |
| Sumter | 6 | Yes | Pop. loss, Housing | 22.7% | 32.4% | 29,174 | 0.58 |
| Talbot | 2 | — | Low ed. | 21.6% | 36.3% | 5,753 | 0.12 |
| Taliaferro | 8 | Yes | Pop. loss | 21.4% | 35.0% | 1,740 | 0.65 |
| Tattnall | 8 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 22.7% | 29.0% | 24,215 | 0.65 |
| Taylor | 8 | Yes | Low ed., Housing | 29.4% | 39.6% | 7,786 | 0.68 |
| Telfair | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 31.0% | 51.3% | 12,174 | 0.72 |
| Terrell | 3 | Yes | Pop. loss | 33.0% | 49.9% | 8,941 | 0.51 |
| Thomas | 4 | — | — | 17.9% | 24.5% | 45,696 | 0.18 |
| Tift | 5 | — | — | 20.9% | 30.1% | 41,322 | 0.23 |
| Toombs | 7 | Yes | Housing | 19.7% | 25.1% | 26,943 | 0.60 |
| Towns | 9 | — | Housing, Retire. | 12.9% | 19.0% | 12,739 | 0.35 |
| Treutlen | 9 | Yes | Low ed. | 25.0% | 40.3% | 6,387 | 0.70 |
| Troup | 4 | — | Housing | 18.5% | 26.1% | 69,821 | 0.19 |
| Turner | 9 | Yes | Low ed. | 21.6% | 25.7% | 8,915 | 0.69 |
| Twiggs | 3 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 14.9% | 14.7% | 7,869 | 0.13 |
| Union | 8 | — | Retire. | 10.4% | 17.4% | 25,598 | 0.30 |
| Upson | 6 | — | — | 21.3% | 30.4% | 27,856 | 0.27 |
| Walker | 2 | — | — | 13.8% | 18.7% | 68,449 | 0.09 |
| Walton | 1 | — | — | 12.2% | 20.0% | 100,361 | 0.05 |
| Ware | 5 | Yes | — | 22.8% | 35.1% | 35,958 | 0.54 |
| Warren | 8 | Yes | Low ed., Pop. loss | 21.8% | 32.2% | 5,175 | 0.65 |
| Washington | 7 | — | Low ed. | 15.5% | 18.8% | 19,893 | 0.29 |
| Wayne | 6 | — | Low ed. | 20.5% | 28.4% | 30,519 | 0.27 |
| Webster | 8 | — | Housing | 26.4% | 42.7% | 2,348 | 0.37 |
| Wheeler | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 21.5% | 25.3% | 7,434 | 0.69 |
| White | 8 | — | — | 11.7% | 18.7% | 28,454 | 0.31 |
| Whitfield | 3 | — | Low ed. | 13.7% | 22.1% | 103,118 | 0.13 |
| Wilcox | 9 | Yes | Low emp., Low ed. | 23.1% | 36.0% | 8,784 | 0.69 |
| Wilkes | 8 | — | Low ed., Pop. loss | 17.0% | 21.0% | 9,553 | 0.33 |
| Wilkinson | 8 | — | Pop. loss | 20.3% | 28.9% | 8,795 | 0.34 |
| Worth | 3 | — | Pop. loss | 20.2% | 28.2% | 20,575 | 0.16 |
Find a food pantry in Georgia
Search Georgia's 164 verified pantries, food banks, and meal programs — filtered by city, open-now status, and service type.
Georgia pantry directoryGeorgia SNAP
Income limits, application steps, and EBT card details for residents of persistent-poverty counties and beyond.
Georgia SNAP guideEmergency food help
National hotlines, 211 referrals, and same-day food options — critical in rural counties where the nearest pantry may be 30+ miles away.
Emergency foodFood deserts atlas
Rural poverty and low food access often overlap. Compare persistent-poverty counties to USDA's low-income / low-access food desert designations.
Georgia food desertsMethodology
How we combined USDA ERS typology codes, the Rural-Urban Continuum, ACS poverty data, and PantryPath's own pantry directory — plus the risk-score formula.
Full methodology